Harry Kane

why dont they just go vlahovic because kane doesnt like it will happen
 
£75m + £25m add ins is an embarrassing offer for a player like Kane. Reading between the lines we’ve tapped Kane up and went in with a low ball offer and tried to bully Spurs and levy
 
i just don't understand why we haven't tabled a bid since june. is the tactic that with so little time on the transfer window, levy will be forced to take whatever bid we put forth?

does anyone here really believe he's just going to accept 120m or 125m or 130m or whatever it is from now until the end of the window?

Because if we do go up to 150m, then what was the point of the last month? we could have just bid that right there, right then and have kane for the past month.

Maybe we don't know all the details, but from all the available evidence i'm struggling to see a transfer strategy that makes sense here.

not being snarky here, can anyone offer an explanation here that makes sense? maybe i'm not reading the situation correctly.
 
Typical Levy, he's a tight arse.

Hell be hoping for an eleventh hour deal so he doesn't have time to spend any cash.


It's his ploy.

Kane will be very much on once he's happy he can't get anyone else in or a team are desperate to sell an asset late on for funds to pay debts.

What's astonishing is how every Spurs fan thinks he's doing them some sort of favour, hook line and sinker.....
 
  • Like
Reactions: kun
twosips said:
Erm...right...heard a little bit of info. As always, the disclaimer: there's always a chance info could be wrong, but once again, I trust the person who told me as they work within the game, and they've told me loads before correctly.

They messaged me on Saturday morning saying that they've heard that City want Kane, yes, obviously, but key bit is not as much as Pep personally wants Kane and Pep is very much the driver behind the move. The catch is now apparently that the club would prefer a 'project' striker like Vlahovic.

That's all I've heard. I've don't know the reasoning, so all I can do is my guess - i'd say maybe it's the price? Kane at a reasonable price? Sure? At the numbers quoted? Nah, Vlahovic.

Sorry if that's just a repeat of what is already out in the world, or not - I hand on heart don't know as I'm 100% not really sure where we're up to with this Kane stuff as I've been away and intensely busy personally for the last few days! I was getting married when that message came through heh.

As always, just passing it on in good faith to you guys. Fuck knows what will happen. If it's true though that it's mainly a Pep thing, it doesn't really fill me with joy regarding the Kane chances, but who knows I guess.
Click to expand...
A project is what we already have Jesus, Torres & Liam Delap

No chance City pay big bucks for a player who plays in an Italian league which is pants

Yes he looks ok but Pep wants a worldy already to hit the ground & goals running

For me its Kane or nothing
 
Sam1980 said:
£75m + £25m add ins is an embarrassing offer for a player like Kane. Reading between the lines we’ve tapped Kane up and went in with a low ball offer and tried to bully Spurs and levy
Click to expand...
if true than yes its a low ball offer.

this bid went in around the time we agreed for 100m bid for Grealish.
imagine if after Arsenal bought White for 50m and they would made an offer for 35m for Ruben Dias too. (all that in theory that Dias would be unhappy and adamant to move to London:D)

Grealish is 3 years younger but had 1 great PL season while Kane has been performing at a high level since 5-6 years in PL and national team too.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Unread Posts

Don't have an account? Register now and see fewer ads!

SIGN UP
Back
Top