Has the BBC become a Tory tool?

where did he minimilise it?

where is mentioning the language used in the 1930 by the nazi party about not only jews but gypsies, communists, capitalist, intellectuals, the disabled, poles, czechs, slovacs and any non arian anti semetic?

The actual languafe used in propaganda writren in the years 1933-1937 it is quite similar to what the tories are spouting now.

If he had accused Sunak and Braveman of wanting to mass murder amd exterminate immigrants and asylum seekers then yes he would have crossed a line, but he never did and never compared this to the final sollution or the horrors that came after the rhetoric of the early 30s.
The analogy Lineker drew is sound, for the reasons you to which you point. Anyone who makes a leap from that to concentration camps is simply looking for reasons to dislike what he has said. It’s irrational and therefore best ignored.
 
If you have a VPN or live in the US all the highlights of the games are available for free on NBC Sports.

View attachment 71829

Longer highlights than most matches on MOTD and they seem to use the international commentary feed so British commentators.

And of course you can pick and choose what games to watch.
"City escape with victory" and "reactions as City barely beat Crystal Palace" were the first two things I saw. Is it the same old anti City rhetoric every week on there too ?
 
The press hounded Sterling because he left their darlings Liverpool and came to City.

Calling it racism is lazy and lets the press off with what the real issue is: Manchester City are hated!
They love the rags even more but reserve the same treatment for Rashford. TAA has been hounded by the same faces that hounded Sterling and Rashford.

Yes, we know City are hated. By certain sections of society, so are black people.
 
That's the problem! They think they are needed; we know they are not! I will turn up to the Leipzig game on Tuesday and not fret one jot at kick off when I can't hear some arse rabbiting on about the guy who MANUre were gonna buy and who had a trial at Wigan, and who's Dad was a lifelong Arsenal fan!

Exactly. But last nights (shit)show didn’t prove they’re not particularly needed. Or at least didn’t prove a revamp is needed.

What they showed last night you can get on Sky’s YouTube channel. That last night wasn’t worth paying a TV licence for.
 
Lovely stuff... Just football and crowd noise, get the overpaid wankers fucked off I'm all for it! Need to stop paying my fuckin licence fee when they're paying that big eared twat millions each year for an hours work every weekend for saying "here's a game of football" "so Alan what do you think about that game".... Has anyone fucked off the licence fee? Do you get in shit doing it or should I have fucked it off years ago?
Watch this guy


Cancel you license https://www.tvlicensing.co.uk/check-if-you-need-one/topics/cancellations-and-refunds-top7
This is because you will only be watching streaming service but no live events

If one of the Tv License salespersons knocks at your door close it don't say a word, if you do the below then they cant knock without trespassing

Write to the BBC to remove their and their agents implied rights of access to your property
http://www.bbctvlicence.com/Withholding implied right of access.htm


Detector vans never worked and the BBC and their agents have no legal power without a court order

If you get letters have a laugh and put them in the bin
 
Last edited:
where did he minimilise it?

where is mentioning the language used in the 1930 by the nazi party about not only jews but gypsies, communists, capitalist, intellectuals, the disabled, poles, czechs, slovacs and any non arian anti semetic?

The actual language used in propaganda writren in the years 1933-1937 it is quite similar to what the tories are spouting now.

If he had accused Sunak and Braveman of wanting to mass murder amd exterminate immigrants and asylum seekers then yes he would have crossed a line, but he never did and never compared this to the final sollution or the horrors that came after the rhetoric of the early 30s.
He minimised it by comparing the description of some limited measures to stop illegal migration into a country with one of the worst crimes in human history. The two aren’t comparable and to imply they are equivalent is to minimise one and exaggerate the other.

Yes, he said the language in the 1930s, not the actual holocaust, but the implication was clear. After all, the nazis aren’t regarded as one of the most evil regimes in history because of their language in the early part of their reign. It was clear the line of argument he was making was to equate the current actions of the government with those of Nazi germany. That is an absolutely risible comparison that is offensive and beyond contempt.
 

Don't have an account? Register now and see fewer ads!

SIGN UP
Back
Top
  AdBlock Detected
Bluemoon relies on advertising to pay our hosting fees. Please support the site by disabling your ad blocking software to help keep the forum sustainable. Thanks.