Hazard Joining Chelsea

[fatbloke]

Cracking player but not what we need if there was any truth in the "I want to play in the No.10 shirt ONLY" comments, we need a winger not another Silva/Nasri type playmaker.

Plus he sounds like he could come a close 2nd on a "Cunts" list just below that Scarface little ****.

 

[Jumanji]

Look at all the players that have signed for us before we were Champions. Just because we're champions doesn't mean that we have a divine right to players.

Sometimes there's lots of factors. For example, if I was a player and not a City fan, I'd prefer London to Manchester 9 out 10 times.

Would you? Fuck me! You haven't been there much then...
Hate the place personally

To each his own. My opinion is that London is a nicer place to live if you can afford to live it well.

 

[Silvex]

Hope that the Media now surrounds Javi Martinez as the latest articles of him going to a different club are now a few days old. Hope he comes to us!

 

[Anonymous]

http://www.theshedend.com/topic/20817-hello-new-chelsea-fan/

check this out

 

[Marvin]

Look at all the players that have signed for us before we were Champions. Just because we're champions doesn't mean that we have a divine right to players.

Sometimes there's lots of factors. For example, if I was a player and not a City fan, I'd prefer London to Manchester 9 out 10 times.

Would you? Fuck me! You haven't been there much then...
Hate the place personally

To each his own. My opinion is that London is a nicer place to live if you can afford to live it well.

Surely footballing ambition comes first.

For a footballer, Mcr might be a bit of a goldfish bowl. San Carlos, Panacea and a couple of Tapas bars

 

[adrianr]

So just to be crystal clear, despite being 100% nailed on to join, the most preferred club, the unrivaled history, the endless reprints day after day after day, Eden Hazard, just like Sneijder, did not in fact sign for the Rags?

 

[rastus]

I'm sure I am not alone in thinking this is not a bad outcome. He was making ridiculous demands for a player who has been playing in the French League, and has a really poor record for Belgium. I am sure he will be a good player but surely City would have said he would be part of the squad, getting games as and when, and he seems to think he is already the main man.

Another thing, Chelsea do not have a manager at the moment, at least not a permanent one, and so who has said where he will play and how often, Abramovitch probably!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

What turned me against him weeks ago was his constant bullshit and teasing regarding colours etc, I really feel we have got off lucky on this one. He and his PR hype have fooled Chelski into a massive deal as good as he is.

 

[Danamy]

There was not a snowball in Hells chance that City would have agreed to these demands.

Surprised we let it run it's course though!

Nothing to lose by letting it run it's course, if anything it's showing everyone else we WONT bow down and get involved in players and agents demands.

It's our terms or no terms.............

We should have stated "due to changes in the demands of the player/agent... We are no longer interested" This also shows we wont be fucked about!

Fuck me, it was a month ago he attended Eastlands Derby, was shown potential houses AND agreed to join City.. so after he starts questioning his earlier decision, the writing was on the wall.

I think City have played it well, no need to say anything really, it's only the leaks from Hazards camp and through the media that we was in for him anyway.

It's not the first or last time an agent will try it on with us during a transfer, the Nasri one nearly collapsed last season with his agent getting greedy until Nasri told him to back off.

We'll be stronger for it in the long run, word is around already that Chelsea will bow to terms if needed.

 

[MSP]

he's getting some serious abuse on his FB page by rags, lol

 

[kenster197]

He chose another club, let it feckin go. We will move on and prosper. Some of the posts on here are becoming embarrassing to read.