SWP's back
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 29 Jun 2009
- Messages
- 89,064
Seeing as that makes no sense I am done talking to you.JoeMercer'sWay said:it's not, unless Simon Heffer wrote it 25 years ago, which is impossible.
Seeing as that makes no sense I am done talking to you.JoeMercer'sWay said:it's not, unless Simon Heffer wrote it 25 years ago, which is impossible.
Tom_mcfc said:In_Good_Kompany said:You must have shit for brains. Whatever we all think about the Scouse victim mentality it's quite clear that the Hillsborough families were totally justified in pursuing their campaign.
Prestwich on his highhorse again. No surprise there. Whilst you lot chat about this on here (or maybe you should go and support lpool instead) i'll be having a proper debate at the supporters meeting
Enjoy....
Debate how much of a penis you are
SWP's back said:Seeing as that makes no sense I am done talking to you.JoeMercer'sWay said:it's not, unless Simon Heffer wrote it 25 years ago, which is impossible.
Supposedly the Editor is meant to read every word of every article but doing that whilst being a full time MP and director of a couple of companies, I very much doubt that happens.The cookie monster said:He will have given the go ahead for them quotes to be printed am I right?SWP's back said:Why do you think? He was the Editor of the Spectator and the Tories had to be seen to distance themselves from it.The cookie monster said:So why was he sent to Liverpool to apologise by Michael howard?
But it does not make him responsible for the article or for writing the words. You're a bright bloke, you know people are made to apologise for things in the public arena that they aren't responsible for all the time.
SWP's back said:Supposedly the Editor is meant to read every word of every article but doing that whilst being a full time MP and director of a couple of companies, I very much doubt that happens.The cookie monster said:He will have given the go ahead for them quotes to be printed am I right?SWP's back said:Why do you think? He was the Editor of the Spectator and the Tories had to be seen to distance themselves from it.
But it does not make him responsible for the article or for writing the words. You're a bright bloke, you know people are made to apologise for things in the public arena that they aren't responsible for all the time.
Either way, he was probably right to apologise for it appearing in the paper but people vilifying him for those words now and trying to say they are his are just trying to point score on tories/toffs on an emotive thread in true bluemoon fashion.
SWP's back said:How did he did his toe in if he didn't write it?
He said they were self pitying, and that it was the fault of drunken hooligans and that they were trying to shift the blame to The Sun. Probably doing it at the behest of one of his Eton chums. The bloke is a ****.Ducado said:SWP's back said:What's Boris done?malg said:If anyone from my family had died there I would be screaming for someone's blood right now. I'd want that **** Kelvin MacKenzie fucking hung, drawn and quartered. I'd also expect a full apology from that fucking arsehole Boris Johnson - can't wait to see what that twat says.
Nothing really he said something about Scoucers being rather self pitying or something like that, nothing to do with this, they got upperty about it, it was an observation, its all about free speech really
Perhaps he stubbed it on a chair leg or something?SWP's back said:How did he did his toe in if he didn't write it?