gordondaviesmoustache
Well-Known Member
Some of us who have touched briefly upon Heysel have made that very point rather than the "whataboutery" that you refer to. Not that one was worse than the other, but that they were both equally tragic and avoidable.glenowen said:Gerry Fitt was an MP from Belfast who some years ago introduced a new word into our vocabulary, in relation to the Northern Ireland Troubles. That word was "whataboutery". He coined this new term to express his extreme frustration at the fact that, after the latest atrocity committed by one side, the other side would attempt to play down its impact by claiming that they had suffered from worse atrocities - "well, that all's very well, but what about...that was much worse". That sort of thing.
Reading the recent references to Heysel in this thread, I am immediately reminded of Fitt's "whataboutery". Are these people really trying to suggest that our sympathy for the Hillsborough victims and their families should, somehow, be diminished by what happened at Heysel? "Hillsborough was terrible, but what about Heysel?”
The violent death of one completely innocent human being at a football match is just as bad as the violent death of any other. There should be absolutely no hierarchy of victimhood in such tragic matters. Those who refer to Heysel in that "whataboutery" fashion, in the same breath as expressing sympathy for the victims of Hillsborough, should be ashamed of themselves.
No shame in that mate.