Hughes Needed More Time

[scorer]

More time.... for what exactly??

The only direction we were going with him was down.

I only wish it had been 17 months earlier... we could be looking forward to winning the Prem this year - given how weak it is.

 

[squirtyflower]

as ever, yet another balanced argument

 

[bizzbo]

he did need more time, but he was improving too slowly to justify giving it to him.

if you see what I mean.

 

[sixlashes]

so did alan ball

 

[kippax_blueboy]

On reflection he should have been given no time and never employed by City.
He is a rag through and though. Agent Hughes.

Glad he's gone.

 

[BlueLlama]

so did alan ball

Whilst I agree that Hughes would have needed 20 years to get us anywhere near winning the Premiership to associate him with A Ball is too much, shame on you.

 

[squirtyflower]

lol
perceptive to the core

 

[panzer1311]

On reflection he should have been given no time and never employed by City.
He is a rag through and though. Agent Hughes.

Glad he's gone.

oh yeh , i forgot "he's a rag "................................brilliant

 

[DontLookBackInAnger]

On reflection he should have been given no time and never employed by City.
He is a rag through and though. Agent Hughes.

Glad he's gone.

oh yeh , i forgot "he's a rag "................................brilliant

I actually think the rag thing kept him in a job, it clouded the piss poor job he was doing.

 

[Pam]

he did need more time, but he was improving too slowly to justify giving it to him.

if you see what I mean.

What makes you say this? There was very little evidence for it. Victory over Arsenal's reserves and a faltering Chelski did not really constitute improvement, and certainly not when you consider it was immediately followed by three goals conceded at Bolton; a hammering by Spuds and shipping another three home goals against Sunderland, whose recent form had been toilet anyway.