Colins Bellend
Well-Known Member
Apart from 4-1 everything else here is BolloxBojinov The Bull said:
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
I hope Jo plays instead of Balo!
- Thread starter Bojinov The Bull
- Start date
bluethai said:I think Jo is the better option for the aerial battle than Balo who isn't suit this kind of opponent. Without any decent aerial player upfront, we'll struggle to keep the ball down to play as Hart tends to hoof the ball upfront all the time.
you are wrong , balotelli is better than jo also as target man
SWP's back
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 29 Jun 2009
- Messages
- 88,790
Bojinov The Bull said:SWP's back said:Any need for that?
Ok - so you HONESTLY believe this and the thread is not a wind up?
In that case, I may be sad but atleast I am not fucking stupid.
Hence 1 person agreeing with you in 3 pages.
Judging by a lot of the reactions and opinions I read on here after matches the fact that only 1 person has agreed is a good thing!
Cannot fault that logic to be fair.
Bojinov The Bull
Well-Known Member
SWP's back said:Bojinov The Bull said:Judging by a lot of the reactions and opinions I read on here after matches the fact that only 1 person has agreed is a good thing!
Cannot fault that logic to be fair.
Why thank you!
Impeccable
Well-Known Member
i8rags said:Jo had a good game. he was embarrassing, we won at Fulham with 10 men.
Take a look at the video of the match and watch Jo's involvement in the build up to Yaya's goal!!!!
This site is gettiing very polite and convivial this week. It's as if a couple of shit-stirring self-publicists that had been winding everybody up for the past few years had just fallen on their twisted swords of injustice.
['silly, smiley face']
['silly, smiley face']
Impeccable
Well-Known Member
bluethai said:I think Jo is the better option for the aerial battle than Balo who isn't suit this kind of opponent. Without any decent aerial player upfront, we'll struggle to keep the ball down to play as Hart tends to hoof the ball upfront all the time.
I honestly have never seen the ball bowled out to our defenders/midfielders as much as with Joe Hart. I say he very RARELY kicks long!
AustinBlue
Well-Known Member
Bojinov The Bull said:SWP's back said:Cannot fault that logic to be fair.
Why thank you!
It's still the worst suggestion since André said "let's save some money and stop the Maginot line at Belgium."
mcfc_paul said:TBH I can't see either playing, think Mancini will go for Milner. Probably the best option imo, think he will cope much better with the physicality they will all face there.
Agree with this. I think Jimmy Milner will come in for Jo. Stoke will wind up Balotelli all game with their snidey fouls. He'll blow & get another ban, but 4 games this time.
Save him for bolton at home. At least they play football now under Coyle.
SWP's back
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 29 Jun 2009
- Messages
- 88,790
coleridge said:This site is gettiing very polite and convivial this week. It's as if a couple of shit-stirring self-publicists that had been winding everybody up for the past few years had just fallen on their twisted swords of injustice.
['silly, smiley face']
fuck off
(only kidding you arse head!)
But actually you do have a point. Come down off topic and kick off randomly in threads, I think that's what I am going to do.<br /><br />-- Thu Nov 25, 2010 2:21 pm --<br /><br />
jimbo101 said:mcfc_paul said:TBH I can't see either playing, think Mancini will go for Milner. Probably the best option imo, think he will cope much better with the physicality they will all face there.
Agree with this. I think Jimmy Milner will come in for Jo. Stoke will wind up Balotelli all game with their snidey fouls. He'll blow & get another ban, but 4 games this time.
Save him for bolton at home. At least they play football now under Coyle.
Fancy a friendly wager for a make-believe mansion I have made up in my mind?