I know the investment has been considerable, but the progress the club has made over the whole of Mancini's tenure is considerable. Perhaps the bar was unrealistically raised after last season?tolmie's hairdoo said:Marvin said:Every team has shortcomings.tolmie's hairdoo said:Nope.
Progressing past Championship teams only masks our shortcomings.
I actually believe it would be a fitting send off, though, for both Mancini and the club to win it.
There was a time not so long ago when instead of brushing good Championship sides apart like Watford and average Championship sides like Leeds apart, we'd go down 0-3 at home.
I'm not expecting anyone to suspend all their critical faculties after any old win, but it strikes me that some fans are overly critical, and made their minds up long ago.
Even accounting for the huge investment, City are ahead of where we expected to be, and it's only because last season's Premiership win boosted expectations to such a stratospheric level that some are blaming the manager for the disappointment over the gap to Utd.
The gap was not inevitable, but there are some matters which are outside a manager's control.
Your last point, I can see where somebody can offer that viewpoint.
However, too many seem to want to look back and your reference to the days when we used to lose at home to cannon-fodder isn't pertinent in my own book.
Just as those who continue to reference where we used to be, York, away, etc.
We are Manchester City is all but name as a club to those days, in terms of finance, professionalism, fans, the whole nine yards.
The problem on here seems to be more a case of feast or famine. Lose to Southampton, we are shit, beat Leeds, world beaters.
I try to base my own perception and opinions over a longer period, across all competitions, and not just in terms of results, but performances, also.
Unrealistic to expect smooth incremental progression.
Better to assess progress And the manager's skills and abilities
I am impressed the way the playing squad continually reacts to setbacks, and that must be down to the manager and the influence he has on them.