Interesting YT Conversations...

[Bigga]

I thought that was interesting!

Never knew her english was so good!

 

[BlueBoy89]

Apologies if it’s been posted already but the series of debates with Jordan Peterson and Sam Harris are well worth a watch! They discuss the origins and definition of “truths”.

 

[Bigga]

I've heard bits and pieces of this as it was late and long, however I'll post it hear if you want to listen and maybe discuss. There are moments of truth and accuracy, genius, rambling, 'ridicule' and questionable thought processing. It's a REAL mixed bag!!

Rogan interviews Kanye West

 

[Bigga]

Good stuff, should you want to examine the arguments.

 

[MellowJoe]

Good stuff, should you want to examine the arguments.

I don't know anything but wow, Wolf does a great Christopher Walken impression.

 

[Mazzarelli's Swiss Cheese]

I've heard bits and pieces of this as it was late and long, however I'll post it hear if you want to listen and maybe discuss. There are moments of truth and accuracy, genius, rambling, 'ridicule' and questionable thought processing. It's a REAL mixed bag!!

Rogan interviews Kanye West

You could fill this thread with Joe rogan stuff. Great interviewer, not limited my TV timescales so really gets into good discussion by letting things evolve pretty naturally.

 

[Bigga]

You could fill this thread with Joe rogan stuff. Great interviewer, not limited my TV timescales so really gets into good discussion by letting things evolve pretty naturally.

Absolutely, I agree.

However, he's at fault for being led, sometimes, so he'll say some dumb shit.

But, he's a 'real world' person and it takes him a while to re-evaluate his original thinking.

 

[Mazzarelli's Swiss Cheese]

Absolutely, I agree.

However, he's at fault for being led, sometimes, so he'll say some dumb shit.

But, he's a 'real world' person and it takes him a while to re-evaluate his original thinking.

Yes, but to an extent I think his success is the ability to morph according to the guest and be led. I think most interviewing Mike tyson or Alex Jones for example would feel the need to adopt a position or signal personal disapproval when it comes to the interviewees 'darker' aspects.

 

[Bigga]

Yes, but to an extent I think his success is the ability to morph according to the guest and be led. I think most interviewing Mike tyson or Alex Jones for example would feel the need to adopt a position or signal personal disapproval when it comes to the interviewees 'darker' aspects.

Again, agreed.

Although I wish he would not be afraid to question (or push back for the Yanks) his guests at times. He did so brilliantly against Dan Crenshaw, who flapped his gums on a reply about socialism. It was embarrassing to witness an "asshole" take apart a politician with a (an accidental?) salient question.

But, yes, it's a great skill to let the guest relax enough to be themselves, thus allowing a fuller inspection of the character.

 

[Mazzarelli's Swiss Cheese]

Again, agreed.

Although I wish he would not be afraid to question (or push back for the Yanks) his guests at times. He did so brilliantly against Dan Crenshaw, who flapped his gums on a reply about socialism. It was embarrassing to witness an "asshole" take apart a politician with a (an accidental?) salient question.

But, yes, it's a great skill to let the guest relax enough to be themselves, thus allowing a fuller inspection of the character.

Not seen that one, I'll give it a watch.