gio's side step
Well-Known Member
Fuzzmaster101 said:Interesting how I seem to highlight your point with a completely different one. I don't think you interpret text very well. Ireland is not good enough for this squad or he'd be part of our plans for the season which he isn't. He looked for a brief time like he could step up but it was a false dawn. Milner is just about Villa's best player. They don't want him gone but can't afford to keep him. Until he's gone he ill be in their 1st team. Ireland isn't good enough for ours and has consistantly proved this over the last year and in pre-season this year. He hasn't stepped up. Shame, I was rooting for the guy but the truth sometimes hurts.gio's side step said:You highlight the point I made myself. The reason he is, is because Villa and Millner are more professional than we are regarding the issue. Ireland is good enough and would have been certainly involved in first team training for fck sake had he not stalled over the move to Villa.
I completely disagree with your analysis. I believe Ireland (as was the case with him training and playing throughout pre-season) was on the periphery of Mancini's plans. He might not have been as important as Vieira for example (what a fcking joke), however he wasn't clearly out of his plans either. If that was the case, why not put him on the transfer list and make it clear? They have only reacted this way because Mancini doesnt like the fact that Ireland hasnt been a good little schoolboy and gone to Villa with no questions asked. I am happy to debate why I think Ireland is a better player than you give him credit for, and the insulting nature of how someone like Vieira would be in the squad before him, when we have enough defensive minded midfield players, and some coming through at youth level, but I was actually responding to the point someone made about Ireland being left out so he doesnt know our tactics, which is a load of bollocks. And that the same should apply for Millner.