Is it right to blame your players in public ?

I know it's a different sport but coaching is similar across many sports; but Richard Agar, the coach of Super League side Wakefield, said this last week:
Plain and simple, our contact in the middle of the field was nowhere near up to scratch, in fact, it was disgraceful. I’ve told them in there, I’m going to lay it firmly at the door of our forwards. We weren’t tackling with our shoulders; too many arms; not getting tight enough and not working hard enough in the ruck area. They just marched us downfield and I don’t think they strung too many passes together themselves offensively because they didn’t need to. Until you get a grip of that area, I don’t think you’ve got much chance.

Yesterday they won 36-20 and were much better in the forwards.
 
@BluePhil8 said:
It might be acceptable as a one off. The problem is Mancini does this everytime we lose. It is normally the strikers fault because "when you have chance to score, you must score". Just pushing the blame from himself to the players which is sly.
Yeah you're right, Mancini should take responsibility for 25+million strikers not finishing chances. REALLY?
I don't mind a public tongue lashing, these are professional footballers who earn a fucking fortune. The team out there yesterday should have had enough about them to see off Southampton. But it was a pathetic display, and the players who wanted it more got the win. Which is embarrassing considering we're supposedly in a title race.
 
Caveman said:
I know it's a different sport but coaching is similar across many sports; but Richard Agar, the coach of Super League side Wakefield, said this last week:
Plain and simple, our contact in the middle of the field was nowhere near up to scratch, in fact, it was disgraceful. I’ve told them in there, I’m going to lay it firmly at the door of our forwards. We weren’t tackling with our shoulders; too many arms; not getting tight enough and not working hard enough in the ruck area. They just marched us downfield and I don’t think they strung too many passes together themselves offensively because they didn’t need to. Until you get a grip of that area, I don’t think you’ve got much chance.

Yesterday they won 36-20 and were much better in the forwards.
He's not singled one player out there for some individual and fairly extreme criticism. That's what I have a problem with Mancini for on this occasion.
 
Dubai Blue said:
Caveman said:
I know it's a different sport but coaching is similar across many sports; but Richard Agar, the coach of Super League side Wakefield, said this last week:
Plain and simple, our contact in the middle of the field was nowhere near up to scratch, in fact, it was disgraceful. I’ve told them in there, I’m going to lay it firmly at the door of our forwards. We weren’t tackling with our shoulders; too many arms; not getting tight enough and not working hard enough in the ruck area. They just marched us downfield and I don’t think they strung too many passes together themselves offensively because they didn’t need to. Until you get a grip of that area, I don’t think you’ve got much chance.

Yesterday they won 36-20 and were much better in the forwards.
He's not singled one player out there for some individual and fairly extreme criticism. That's what I have a problem with Mancini for on this occasion.
Good point. I suppose it can knock a player's confidence and faith when singled out.
 
For the first time yesterday it looked to me as if the players didn't want to play for the manager.
I think Mancini's comments after the game were born out of deep frustration and the knowledge there is a problem with some players (probably wilfully) not performing for him. I think he knows it's virtually over for him.
Shame cos I like the man and he as he has done so much that is good for us in his time here.
We should never forget this as some posters seem to have already done.
 
mancini has done it to take the pressure off himself, pretty poor man management imo. it is clear from a team organisation, tactical, belief perspective...we are a shadow of our championship winning team.
 
It can be effective if its not done all the time and when it's constantly picking out individuals. Most of the team bar one or two were rubbish. Also when players do well you should praise them in public as well.
 
"A good workman never blames his tools..." or at least not in front of the rapacious, City-hating footy media. Seriously, it's just very very poor man-management, and over a longer period of time, it has a terribly corrosive effect on squad morale and manger/player relationships.
 

Don't have an account? Register now and see fewer ads!

SIGN UP
Back
Top
  AdBlock Detected
Bluemoon relies on advertising to pay our hosting fees. Please support the site by disabling your ad blocking software to help keep the forum sustainable. Thanks.