Is it time to unmask the muslim woman?

rickmcfc said:
mcfcnorthstand said:
Bikers have to take helmets off in banks, as carn't hide face.


Exactly, my point. One rule for one, another rule for others.

Then take it up with the Bank. There's no need to get the government involved in any way other than to call on it to not force banks into allowing people in Burkas to enter.
 
slicky202 said:
Banned Tosspot said:
Do these people work?
nah probably claim of the state

hahaha.

The girls in the first article were students (fee-paying whether English or Foreign)

I talk to a headsarf wearing Muslim woman eveyday. She works 6am to 6pm 6 days a week and on the 7th she goes to the wholesalers. She probably puts in more hours and pays more taxes then you two put together.

And i've gotta piss me sides at all those who claim to be 'intimidated' by someone wearing a headscarf/burkha/hijab/crash-helmet.

The bus driver was a twat.
 
ElanJo said:
rickmcfc said:
Exactly, my point. One rule for one, another rule for others.

Then take it up with the Bank. There's no need to get the government involved in any way other than to call on it to not force banks into allowing people in Burkas to enter.


When its a matter of national security then i feel the government need to take action, not the bank.
 
rickmcfc said:
ElanJo said:
Then take it up with the Bank. There's no need to get the government involved in any way other than to call on it to not force banks into allowing people in Burkas to enter.


When its a matter of national security then i feel the government need to take action, not the bank.
How is it a matter of national security? You haven't explained that at all. I don't recall any of the 7/7 terrorists wearing burkas.
 
Skashion said:
rickmcfc said:
When its a matter of national security then i feel the government need to take action, not the bank.
How is it a matter of national security? You haven't explained that at all. I don't recall any of the 7/7 terrorists wearing burkas.


So just because the horrible events of 7/7 were not carried out by terrorist wearing burkas, how does that mean than future possible attacks wont be carried out by men/women/anyone hiding in them? Oh, look back at a previous page, there is a few crimes commited by people wearing burkas.
 
rickmcfc said:
Skashion said:
How is it a matter of national security? You haven't explained that at all. I don't recall any of the 7/7 terrorists wearing burkas.


So just because the horrible events of 7/7 were not carried out by terrorist wearing burkas, how does that mean than future possible attacks wont be carried out by men/women/anyone hiding in them? Oh, look back at a previous page, there is a few crimes commited by people wearing burkas.

So what you're really calling for is a ban of anything that could obstruct identification? How far do you go with that? Cosmetic surgery banned? A hooded coat? Makeup? A haircut/style?
 
Skashion said:
rickmcfc said:
So just because the horrible events of 7/7 were not carried out by terrorist wearing burkas, how does that mean than future possible attacks wont be carried out by men/women/anyone hiding in them? Oh, look back at a previous page, there is a few crimes commited by people wearing burkas.

So what you're really calling for is a ban of anything that could obstruct identification? How far do you go with that? Cosmetic surgery banned? A hooded coat? Makeup? A haircut/style?


dont be pathetic. All of those you just listed still allow you to recognise someone. Someone will know them and recognise them if they needed to be found. Wearing a dark cloak over your entire body only showing your eyes you cant even tell what sex they are, let alone their personal appearence. So thats is why it is a security issue.
 
rickmcfc said:
dont be pathetic. All of those you just listed still allow you to recognise someone. Someone will know them and recognise them if they needed to be found. Wearing a dark cloak over your entire body only showing your eyes you cant even tell what sex they are, let alone their personal appearence. So thats is why it is a security issue.
What about long hair which could then positioned in front of their face? Ban long hair, yes?
 
Typically one of the students in the OP goes for the 'racist' angle....it's nothing of the sort. Religion and race are two totally seperate issues.
 

Don't have an account? Register now and see fewer ads!

SIGN UP
Back
Top
  AdBlock Detected
Bluemoon relies on advertising to pay our hosting fees. Please support the site by disabling your ad blocking software to help keep the forum sustainable. Thanks.