Is it true Aguero can't be banned? (Update P43)

[Pigeonho]

Re: Is it true Aguero can't be banned?

Funny how the morality squad are quick to slaughter one of their own players but then rip into people who question such matters as poor tactics and form.

Not saying what Kun did was right, but only City fans could slag off their own.

Who's 'slagging' Kun off? I can't see one post which actually does that? If you think people won't criticise him just because he's a city player, you're wrong.
What would you think if it was the other way round, and Luiz lunged into Ageuro's legs with intent?

 

[NipHolmes]

Re: Is it true Aguero can't be banned?

Funny how the morality squad are quick to slaughter one of their own players but then rip into people who question such matters as poor tactics and form.

Not saying what Kun did was right, but only City fans could slag off their own.

Who's 'slagging' Kun off? I can't see one post which actually does that? If you think people won't criticise him just because he's a city player, you're wrong.
What would you think if it was the other way round, and Luiz lunged into Ageuro's legs with intent?

Could Luiz not have simply barged Aguero out the way instead of whacking an arm out?

He literally threw out an arm that could've hit him in the face.

Fuck Luiz.

 

[Pigeonho]

Re: Is it true Aguero can't be banned?

Funny how the morality squad are quick to slaughter one of their own players but then rip into people who question such matters as poor tactics and form.

Not saying what Kun did was right, but only City fans could slag off their own.

Who's 'slagging' Kun off? I can't see one post which actually does that? If you think people won't criticise him just because he's a city player, you're wrong.
What would you think if it was the other way round, and Luiz lunged into Ageuro's legs with intent?

Could Luiz not have simply barged Aguero out the way instead of whacking an arm out?

He literally threw out an arm that could've hit him in the face.

Fuck Luiz.

Yeah fuck Luiz for doing what he did, but does that change the fact Aguero did what he did? Hopefully the ref will say he saw it and that's that put to bed, but no-one can have any arguments if he gets done for it.

 

[NipHolmes]

Re: Is it true Aguero can't be banned?

Who's 'slagging' Kun off? I can't see one post which actually does that? If you think people won't criticise him just because he's a city player, you're wrong.
What would you think if it was the other way round, and Luiz lunged into Ageuro's legs with intent?

Could Luiz not have simply barged Aguero out the way instead of whacking an arm out?

He literally threw out an arm that could've hit him in the face.

Fuck Luiz.

Yeah fuck Luiz for doing what he did, but does that change the fact Aguero did what he did? Hopefully the ref will say he saw it and that's that put to bed, but no-one can have any arguments if he gets done for it.

Aguero is bang to rights. No evading what he did. He clearly jumped and landed on Luiz. He's guilty yes, but so is Luiz and Torres, hopefully they get pinched.

 

[Pigeonho]

Re: Is it true Aguero can't be banned?

Could Luiz not have simply barged Aguero out the way instead of whacking an arm out?

He literally threw out an arm that could've hit him in the face.

Fuck Luiz.

Yeah fuck Luiz for doing what he did, but does that change the fact Aguero did what he did? Hopefully the ref will say he saw it and that's that put to bed, but no-one can have any arguments if he gets done for it.

Aguero is bang to rights. No evading what he did. He clearly jumped and landed on Luiz. He's guilty yes, but so is Luiz and Torres, hopefully they get pinched.

Hopefully they will.

 

[alky313]

Re: Is it true Aguero can't be banned?

Where is the elbow... Gif?

 

[NipHolmes]

Re: Is it true Aguero can't be banned?

Where is the elbow... Gif?

The link below

http://sports.yahoo.com/blogs/soccer-dirty-tackle/dtotd-kun-aguero-two-footed-stomp-david-luiz-171048797--sow.html

-- Mon Apr 15, 2013 10:03 am --

get elbowed for sure but reacts.

 

[Prestwich_Blue]

Re: Is it true Aguero can't be banned?

My own opinion is that if someone does something that's premeditated and dangerous then it should be punished, regardless of this nonsense about whether the referee "saw" it or not.

But the current situation does seem to be a stick to beat us with rather than applied consistently. So Mario got punished for his stamp on Parker but why did Huth not get retrospectively punished for his elbow on the same player in the final 2 seasons ago or Whelan earlier this season? The referee couldn't have "seen" that otherwise he'd have sent him off.

So let's take the subjectivity out of it and apply it objectively then no one can have any complaint.

 

[RonIpstone]

Re: Is it true Aguero can't be banned?

From an FA handbook

When is The FA prevented from taking action?

FIFA guidelines aimed at avoiding the “re-refereeing” of matches generally prevent The FA from taking disciplinary action on incidents which are seen and dealt with at the time by the match officials (this includes taking no action). As a general rule, if the match officials see an incident and have jurisdiction to take action, The FA cannot act retrospectively.

For instance, these guidelines prevent The FA from upgrading/downgrading yellow and red cards based on retrospective advice provided by the match referee.

 

[NipHolmes]

Re: Is it true Aguero can't be banned?

My own opinion is that if someone does something that's premeditated and dangerous then it should be punished, regardless of this nonsense about whether the referee "saw" it or not.

But the current situation does seem to be a stick to beat us with rather than applied consistently. So Mario got punished for his stamp on Parker but why did Huth not get retrospectively punished for his elbow on the same player in the final 2 seasons ago or Whelan earlier this season? The referee couldn't have "seen" that otherwise he'd have sent him off.

So let's take the subjectivity out of it and apply it objectively then no one can have any complaint.

I'm of the opinion that if a challenge is missed and the game finishes then the players have a clean slate. Punishing a player after the game doesn't make up the challenge as the games finished. Spurs for instance had Balotelli get away with the stamp and he scored the winner. Punishing him later on didn't help Spurs one bit. Just like it wouldn't have helped us if Whelan was banned after the Garcia challenge.

It takes the unfairness out because some players will get punished aned somne won't. Leting the game finish and then moving on is the best scenario because right now we are getting dubious decisions retrospectively and I don't believe that's fair nor is it helping the team who was victim to such fouls etc.