Is now the time to consider Mancini's tenure at the club

[smeeagain]

This is not the time to consider the managers position unless you are looking for instant success or never really wanted him in the first place.

i disagree , now is the ideal time to replace him , theres enough games left for any new manager to really rally the team, and challenge united
otherwise pray for a second miracle

 

[moomba]

This is not the time to consider the managers position unless you are looking for instant success or never really wanted him in the first place.

i disagree , now is the ideal time to replace him , theres enough games left for any new manager to really rally the team, and challenge united
otherwise pray for a second miracle

You don't win a league because of a miracle, you win it because you were the better team over the course of the season.

 

[Danielmanc]

This is not the time to consider the managers position unless you are looking for instant success or never really wanted him in the first place.

i disagree , now is the ideal time to replace him , theres enough games left for any new manager to really rally the team, and challenge united
otherwise pray for a second miracle

It wasn't a miracle last season. We won more matches at the end than they did - we also scored more goals. No miracle - just that we were better.

 

[BlueAnorak]

I truly hope that the City manager is not sacked (ever) for ONE season when the team goes slightly backwards - especially if like Mancini they have been successful.
We must give our manager the full length of their contract (another 2.5 years at least for Mancini till the contract break-clause when City or Mancini can back out) unless they are totally rank - as Hughes was.

Secure job tenure will allow the City manager to build long term time success!

 

[Paulmcfc2703]

I truly hope that the City manager is not sacked (ever) for ONE season when the team goes slightly backwards - especially if like Mancini they have been successful.
We must give our manager the full length of their contract (another 2.5 years at least for Mancini till the contract break-clause when City or Mancini can back out) unless they are totally rank - as Hughes was.

Secure job tenure will allow the City manager to build long term time success!

The issue is though for us to build towards the future it is vital to comply to FFP. To comply to that you need to be successful in Europe and for all his domestic success Mancini seems clueless in the CL.

 

[andyhinch]

I truly hope that the City manager is not sacked (ever) for ONE season when the team goes slightly backwards - especially if like Mancini they have been successful.
We must give our manager the full length of their contract (another 2.5 years at least for Mancini till the contract break-clause when City or Mancini can back out) unless they are totally rank - as Hughes was.

Secure job tenure will allow the City manager to build long term time success!

Not sure if I'm happy with some of the sense being talk here:)

 

[Utter bobbins]

This is not the time to consider the managers position unless you are looking for instant success or never really wanted him in the first place.

i disagree , now is the ideal time to replace him , theres enough games left for any new manager to really rally the team, and challenge united
otherwise pray for a second miracle

We are six points worse off than last season and we had a bad January, those points can be made up. If we get more points than last season but come second is that an improvement or not?

 

[bluemc1]

This is not the time to consider the managers position unless you are looking for instant success or never really wanted him in the first place.

i disagree , now is the ideal time to replace him , theres enough games left for any new manager to really rally the team, and challenge united
otherwise pray for a second miracle

We are six points worse off than last season and we had a bad January, those points can be made up. If we get more points than last season but come second is that an improvement or not?

yes it is, would just be someone has improved more, if we get less points have we gone backwards ?

 

[samharris]

I truly hope that the City manager is not sacked (ever) for ONE season when the team goes slightly backwards - especially if like Mancini they have been successful.
We must give our manager the full length of their contract (another 2.5 years at least for Mancini till the contract break-clause when City or Mancini can back out) unless they are totally rank - as Hughes was.

Secure job tenure will allow the City manager to build long term time success!

sour alex needed time at the swamp, Bob so far has done better in the time he's had.

 

[Danielmanc]

I truly hope that the City manager is not sacked (ever) for ONE season when the team goes slightly backwards - especially if like Mancini they have been successful.
We must give our manager the full length of their contract (another 2.5 years at least for Mancini till the contract break-clause when City or Mancini can back out) unless they are totally rank - as Hughes was.

Secure job tenure will allow the City manager to build long term time success!

sour alex needed time at the swamp, Bob so far has done better in the time he's had.

I agree but you'll just get the "anyone could have done it with his resources" reply from those arrogant enough to think it is easy to win the PL

 

[billfromthehill]

if u dont like it here mike u cud go elsewhere u no by the way, wat a shitty thread

 

[The Future's Blue]

This is not the time to consider the managers position unless you are looking for instant success or never really wanted him in the first place.

i disagree , now is the ideal time to replace him , theres enough games left for any new manager to really rally the team, and challenge united
otherwise pray for a second miracle

I believe Mark Hughes is available.

 

[blueinsa]

if u dont like it here mike u cud go elsewhere u no by the way, wat a shitty thread

You don't get charged extra for spelling words correctly on here!

 

[gordondaviesmoustache]

if u dont like it here mike u cud go elsewhere u no by the way, wat a shitty thread

You don't get charged extra for spelling words correctly on here!

I was thinking exactly the same!

I had to read that three fucking times to try and fathom what the fuck he was trying to say.

 

[FantasyIreland]

if u dont like it here mike u cud go elsewhere u no by the way, wat a shitty thread

You don't get charged extra for spelling words correctly on here!

I was thinking exactly the same!

I had to read that three fucking times to try and fathom what the fuck he was trying to say.

Either he's 14 or daft or more probable,both.

 

[gordondaviesmoustache]

You don't get charged extra for spelling words correctly on here!

I was thinking exactly the same!

I had to read that three fucking times to try and fathom what the fuck he was trying to say.

Either he's 14 or daft or more probable,both.

I am always suspicious of posters with usernames that are all in lower case with no gaps between the words.

 

[smeeagain]

notice that hes a "mancini inner"

 

[bernabias home shirt]

We embarrassed ourselves in Amsterdam in a game which was absolutely crucial to our hopes.

Do you hold the players accountable in anyway for our performances in Amsterdam? Or is it all down to Mancini?

Absolutely all down to Mancini. We came out in the second half much improved on the way we started the first, and Ajax scored their goal from a set piece against the run of play. Mancini immediately subbed Lescott for Kolarov in his fury, completely disjointed the back four in the process, and Ajax scored a third within 5 minutes thus killing the game.

Just thought i would ask while your blaming mancini for his mistakes,which is fair enough
What about moo is it down to him they are 16 points behind in la liga
Is it Poor management?
You or dave have never answered the question on this thread for some reason

 

[sir baconface]

I was thinking exactly the same!

I had to read that three fucking times to try and fathom what the fuck he was trying to say.

Either he's 14 or daft or more probable,both.

I am always suspicious of posters with usernames that are all in lower case with no gaps between the words.

Always trust your instinct, gordondaviesmoustache. ;)

 

[coleridge]

I was thinking exactly the same!

I had to read that three fucking times to try and fathom what the fuck he was trying to say.

Either he's 14 or daft or more probable,both.

I am always suspicious of posters with usernames that are all in lower case with no gaps between the words.

iknowwhatyoumeantheyarenottobetrusted