gordondaviesmoustache said:I will qualify what I said by saying that you only ever post when things are looking shaky for Mancini.Your posting history in entirely concurrent and consistent with someone whose hatred for our manager far exceeds his love for City.DD said:gordondaviesmoustache said:You only ever seem to post when we lose.
A few weeks ago you felt that losing to united could serve a wider purpose, something no City fan I know could ever contemplate.
I imagine you must have enjoyed today.
I actually posted about 50 times the night before we lost our first game, so your second paragraph has completely contradicted your first. As for the third, well, obviously not, or I wouldn't be getting so pissed off with life as to deal with people like yourself who refuse to look beyond the pale.
My opinion is the same now as it is then.
You can throw up that quote all you like (which I admitted was a bit silly soon after I said it) but the point remains; for the long term good, we will be much better off without Mancini.
I have no issue with well reasoned arguments against our manager, he certainly has a case to answer, but I am inimical to someone who only seems to be animated about our club when things are not going to plan. I'm not saying you're a rag, but that is most certainly one of the hallmarks of such people who post on here.
That said, I have been going to City for 35 years now and had to sit next to negative, moaning, tiresome 'bitter blues' ad nauseum, and had my fair share of run ins with them, so there is more than one plausible explanation for your disposition.
Either way I certainly wouldn't want to be next to you on the trenches.
Well made points. there certainly are a lot of tiresome 'bitter blues'. Unhappy when we have Alan Ball or Mr Pearce, unhappy when we have a manager who has won 3 pieces of silverware in 3 years - one of which was just 7 months ago and was the biggest prize ever. And if you think Champions League is more important - ask Fergie