Is now the time to consider Mancini's tenure at the club

[Feed-The-Goat]

Re: Is now the time to consider Mancini's tenure at the clubs

Flapping again.

Sad.

 

[waspish]

Re: Is now the time to consider Mancini's tenure at the clubs

I'd settle for 5 more premier titles and have Mancini for his full contract of five years then see where we are, the premier for me is what gives me the buzz and the ammo to whined up rags

I guess some people just don't get it. Most of the people in here are just happy that we're in the CL at all, and ecstatic that we won the league.

Guess what?

WE ALL ARE.

Problem is: We've had nearly a billion pounds dumped into the club, and winning league games to piss off the rags isn't what that money was for. If the owners get the impression that the CL is a bridge to far for Mancini, then he's going to be updating his CV here soon.

so are we just meant to win the champions league like that ???? straight away, its gonna take time most clubs have only ever won it won or twice in there whole history.

Correct! It's unbelievable that they expect us to roll over teams and get out of groups like we have!

 

[mrt4919]

Re: Is now the time to consider Mancini's tenure at the clubs

Show me when Arsenal, Cheslea or the Shite have had the champions of Spain, Germany and Holland in their group. If we'd have had Braga, Clunge and The Mauldeth in our group we'd have pissed it as well!

Tell me when any of those clubs failed to get out of the group stage two years on the trot with a 250M pound squad, and the highest paid manager in England?

Answer: None of them.

We all know if Mancini was sacked this summer, and Mourinho was brought it, we'd make it to the groups easily. I base my assertions on history.

You base your assertions on wishful thinking and idle speculation, Mancini is the Man, stability in management is the way forward for our club not knee jerk reaction to a minor blip in our forward momentum

 

[waspish]

Re: Is now the time to consider Mancini's tenure at the clubs

Show me when Arsenal, Cheslea or the Shite have had the champions of Spain, Germany and Holland in their group. If we'd have had Braga, Clunge and The Mauldeth in our group we'd have pissed it as well!

Tell me when any of those clubs failed to get out of the group stage two years on the trot with a 250M pound squad, and the highest paid manager in England?

Answer: None of them.

We all know if Mancini was sacked this summer, and Mourinho was brought it, we'd make it to the groups easily. I base my assertions on history.

Err the scum last season

 

[goshogun52]

Re: Is now the time to consider Mancini's tenure at the clubs

Unfortunately it is true, he sucks in Europe. He would get fired lot sooner at Inter if he would fail in group stages. He reached the quarter finals 2-3 times but no more.

Here quarter final would be a dream after all these performances.
Will he get better? Dont think so.

It's not like he has to beat Real, Bayern, Barca to be succesful.
He has to beat Ajax, Napoli, Dortmund, Villarreal so far.
We could only beat Villarreal last year but do you know they were so shit last year that they got relegated from La Liga? That says a lot about them.

We played 4 matches against Ajax, Napoli, Dortmund and all he could get is 2 points at home, and the Dortmund match was a big fail, only saved by a late handball penalty after a Joe Hart special show.

The question is will the owners remain patient if he keeps getting domestic succes but fails big time in Europe.

Dont forget the difference between CL group and knock-out stages is 8-10 m pounds. Even is you finish in the first round of the knock-out ties. If you go 1-2 rounds it is 10-15 m more income. + more home games, more ticket income etc., being a real factor in CL provides greater chances for better sponsor deals.

So will the owners be OK with domestic success=winning the league but nothing in the CL?

And will there be any domestic success? It is not like Mancini's years at Inter where he won the league 3 ties in a row but their biggest rival was AS Roma.
Not really the level of Chelsea's or United's.
(Juventus was in Serie B, like Napoli, Milan was concentrating on CL).

Finally someone speaks out the truth
brilliant!

Bollocks posts and that really is the truth

yea, whatever you don't like is a bollocks post

just a friendly reminder...that doesn't make you higher though :)

 

[ranxerox]

Re: Is now the time to consider Mancini's tenure at the clubs

He'll defo come under some heat and questions will asked, however barring a disastrous League campaign he'll be safe.

Next year though the pressure will really be on when it comes to the CL.

 

[Gaylord du Bois]

Re: Is now the time to consider Mancini's tenure at the clubs

The story is that the Sheikh wanted Mourinho at any cost this summer but Khaldoon stuck by his mate.

Any more substance to add to this? We can all make stuff up, but the facts are that a 5 year contract was signed.

I don't make stuff up.

Come off it who the fuck was privvy to that conversation other than those two?

 

[Prestwich_Blue]

Re: Is now the time to consider Mancini's tenure at the clubs

Any more substance to add to this? We can all make stuff up, but the facts are that a 5 year contract was signed.

I don't make stuff up.

Come off it who the fuck was privvy to that conversation other than those two?

Lots of people.

 

[scotty123]

Re: Is now the time to consider Mancini's tenure at the clubs

Has this really made 17 pages already?

Yes Strongbow, the back stabbers, snakes , and reptiles are out in force tonight, make me puke the lot of them.
They all had their dicks in their hands in May

 

[kunaguero10]

Re: Is now the time to consider Mancini's tenure at the clubs

haven't read the thread but for me, league is and always should be the priority, any success in the champions league would be a bonus but means little without doing well in the league. look at chelsea, they flaked the CL and everyone knows their win doesn't mean much because they were dire in the league last year.

FORZA MANCINI