Is now the time to consider Mancini's tenure at the club

[forevermancity]

Re: Is now the time to consider Mancini's tenure at the clubs

what I haven't been able to get my head around in the last 24 hours or so is why he started lescott , and still i'm not able

because he has been our most consistant defender this season and we he was justified in starting him as he played well.

Until he strangely took him off then went with 3 at the back for 5 mins, conceeding straight away

lescott played well ? ahahahhahahahahahhahahahahahahahhaha i see what you did here..... stop clarkieing me please

i refer you to my previous post, your hatred for our english players and your blind loyalty to mancini and mario make's your football knowledge very limited.

If you cannot see the mistakes which mancini is making this season, then you are 100% blinded by some kind of italian loyalty!

 

[Mancio]

Re: Is now the time to consider Mancini's tenure at the clubs

because he has been our most consistant defender this season and we he was justified in starting him as he played well.

Until he strangely took him off then went with 3 at the back for 5 mins, conceeding straight away

lescott played well ? ahahahhahahahahahhahahahahahahahhaha i see what you did here..... stop clarkieing me please

i refer you to my previous post, your hatred for our english players and your blind loyalty to mancini and mario make's your football knowledge very limited.

If you cannot see the mistakes which mancini is making this season, then you are 100% blinded by some kind of italian loyalty!

i see the mistakes mancini is making , the biggest one out of them is playing lescott

 

[Anonymous]

Re: Is now the time to consider Mancini's tenure at the clubs

flapping fuckers doing my head in

What about people who think we have a very good manager but one who is far from perfect and drops the occasional very large bollock ? :)

Seriously though, what I haven't been able to get my head around in the last 24 hours or so is why take Lescott off and switch to three at the back so quickly after conceding the goal. Right before we conceded the second goal we were well on top and pressing Ajax up the field and looked like we knew what we were doing. We concede the goal, and the man inexplicably fucks with the shape leaving Clichy as a makeshift center half, and Vinny with a look of pure dread on his face, and we go and concede a third.

He fucked up last night.

He did that yes. But this is a thread asking if he should be fired.

I answered that last night. I believe my post was something like "judging by tonight's performance, if Mancini needs to consider his future then so do a few of the players". It's ludicrous to talk about a manager's future in October after he's just delivered the title. And the players have to take their share of the blame for last night's dogshit performance. But the result hangs on Mancini's neck because I think the change at the back killed the game for us and resulted in their third goal.

You've got to learn from your mistakes.

 

[forevermancity]

Re: Is now the time to consider Mancini's tenure at the clubs

lescott played well ? ahahahhahahahahahhahahahahahahahhaha i see what you did here..... stop clarkieing me please

i refer you to my previous post, your hatred for our english players and your blind loyalty to mancini and mario make's your football knowledge very limited.

If you cannot see the mistakes which mancini is making this season, then you are 100% blinded by some kind of italian loyalty!

i see the mistakes mancini is making , the biggest one out of them is playing lescott

what would you have done then?

lescott and kompany are our best partnership

whenever mancini drops lescott, kompany and the rest of the defense look nervous and subsequently dodgy (er)

in a must win game, to play a young lad like nasty it would be unfair on him

 

[Ray78]

His position will not be reviewed until at least the end of this season, and when we do have performances like last night City always bounces back.

 

[Pie]

We should have sacked him after the loss to Arsenal last season.
We'll never win anything with him in charge.

 

[forevermancity]

His position will not be reviewed until at least the end of this season, and when we do have performances like last night City always bounces back.

the only time we have bounced back this season is after getting schooled by dortmund then hammering sunderland....

 

[cookster]

Re: Is now the time to consider Mancini's tenure at the clubs

because he has been our most consistant defender this season and we he was justified in starting him as he played well.

Until he strangely took him off then went with 3 at the back for 5 mins, conceeding straight away

lescott played well ? ahahahhahahahahahhahahahahahahahhaha i see what you did here..... stop clarkieing me please

i refer you to my previous post, your hatred for our english players and your blind loyalty to mancini and mario make's your football knowledge very limited.

If you cannot see the mistakes which mancini is making this season, then you are 100% blinded by some kind of italian loyalty!

Don't rise to the bait, he's more one-eyed than Cyclops

 

[Mancio]

Re: Is now the time to consider Mancini's tenure at the clubs

i refer you to my previous post, your hatred for our english players and your blind loyalty to mancini and mario make's your football knowledge very limited.

If you cannot see the mistakes which mancini is making this season, then you are 100% blinded by some kind of italian loyalty!

i see the mistakes mancini is making , the biggest one out of them is playing lescott

what would you have done then?

lescott and kompany are our best partnership

whenever mancini drops lescott, kompany and the rest of the defense look nervous and subsequently dodgy (er)

in a must win game, to play a young lad like nasty it would be unfair on him

so mancini is forced to play a slow clumsy clueless player like lescott is only to be fair with nastasic ? maybe you are right , then add to this the fact that yesterday werent available zabaleta nor maicon so mancini was forced to play the clumsy clueless richards , and werent available any other midfielder but evans so mancini was forced to play the slow slow slow slow slow slow player that barry is and the clueless clueless headlesschiken that milner is.

well.... at this point i've to thank you for having forced me to do an analisys at the end of wich it seem the only true mistake mancini did was to play that clumsy slow clueless player that dzeko is. goodnight sir.

 

[The Future's Blue]

To add some balance to your wikipedia research. You forgot to mention the first club he managed Fiorentina, didn't they get relegated?

Another financially crippled team who had to sell their best players. He won a cup with in his first ever year as a manager, he didn't even have his badges yet according to that same Wikipedia you mentioned. Yes they were relegated, half a season after he left. So he won a cup while not even a fully qualified coach and his financially crippled team were struggling in the relegation zone when he resigned. Hardly damning evidence against him and even if it were, not enough to counter the great work he did at Lazio, Inter, and our own club. How did the greats of management do in their first year?

Fuck me, Cooksters statement was straight out of the Rag Tops book of devious quotes. Unbelievable Jeff!