Is now the time to consider Mancini's tenure at the club

Re: Is now the time to consider Mancini's tenure at the clubs

johnny crossan said:
he is an Inter supporter and an Italy supporter and a City supporter in that order - but they all play in blue

He'll never be a blue. Every single Bosnian on this forum is a bigger blue than he'll ever be. You know why - because they may defend Edin to the hilt and they might blindly think he's better than all our strikers, but ultimately what they don't do is look down their nose at our English players as some sort of footballing halfwits. Mancio is a flat out racist. What's worse, is as evidenced in this thread he accuses those who actually expose his nonsense as racists. He is the very definition of a wum and should have been banned a long time ago.
 
Santiago Street . said:
It amuses me the morons on here berating Roberto for making obvious mistakes and being a rubbish manager.

Weren't you around 5 years ago or 10 years ago? You ever heard of Frank Clark or Alan Ball or John Benson ? This guy's a top class manager who's got a proven track record of success. Who do you fucking clowns want instead ? Go on all shout at once ..................... MOURINHO.

Tabloid reading halfwits


Care to show a manager in the neighborhood of his salary that has made such blatantly poor decisions in Europe? AVB even got Chelsea through the round of 16 with a cheaper squad. Yes, we know what all these previous managers did. They were shit with relatively shit squads and shit resources. No one expected success in Europe, much less the league with those wobs.

Please tell me though, does Mancini's track record of success include Europe? Also tell me, does the entire investment strategy of our owner hinge on European football?
 
Re: Is now the time to consider Mancini's tenure at the clubs

Dethred said:
levets said:
-There was no player error involved in the goal before halftime.
======
Have another look at what happens to allow the ball out wide.

-Lescott was part of a diamond zonal marking formation that had no players on either posts.
====
Lescotts fault all day.... And I'm a fan of JL.

-There was no player error for the third goal.
==========
Have another look. does Barry lose possession to Eriksson?

If every player plays below their ability, then you cannot blame the fucking players. Simple as that.
==========
Are you on fucking drugs? what the fuck is this?

I'll ask you again... Did Kun, Nasri & Richards all miss clear opportunities to put us 2-0 ahead?

Did the midfield lose possession bang on HT?

Did Lescott allow a free header at a corner?

Did Barry lose possession for the 3rd

Did Edin miss 2 clear opportunities late on?

The answer to each question is absolutely fucking yes...

so which mistake that mancini made is bigger than these...

flapping fuckers doing my head in


Dear child, if all it took to lose a match of football 3-1 playing a group of superstars against an academy team, was losing possession a few times (a third of the way up the fucking pitch), and a few missed chances, then every game would end in a loss... for both teams (yes that's impossible, which illustrates the stupidity of your post).

Did you not watch the fucking match? The first goal went in because Clichy was caught trying to defend a cross and the player it was sent to (who also scored). Mancini doesn't get paid to prance around the bloody technical area shouting random poems, he is paid to see the threat coming (and it was mentioned before the 40th minute). All Mancini had to do was hold his defensive midfielders behind their attacking midfield and there would have been no confusion by Clichy.

Second goal was 100% down to zonal marking in the box. They were clearly setup in a half-diamond with no one instructed to cover the posts. The same fucking thing allowed Skrtel to score on us at Liverpool. Had they man-marked and had someone on each post, if Lescott would have been beaten (unlikely if he was able to get a spring), then Clichy would have cleared it from the post. It was no accident, that defensive mistake, that was a blatant strategic decision. Who is ultimately responsible for strategic decisions? Yaya Toure, Barry, Kompany? Pfff. You are clueless.

The Third goal came within a couple minutes of changing to a back three. This decision we all know was a shit decision. If you think it wasn't then why THE FUCK did Mancini immediately change back to a back four after the goal? Our defense was in such tatters that Clichy didn't even know what position he was going to be moving to. No one to blame but Mancini. Or wait, was it Dzeko's fault they switched to a back 3, had no idea what the fuck they were doing, and then let a player get a free shot from the edge of the box??? Give me a fucking break.

I suppose it was just a fluke that Mourinho took Mancini's European flops and won the CL with them after two years? Its pretty clear that Mancini knows how to build a team, its even more clear that once he's assembled it, he knows how to manage it in the domestic leagues. Its absolutely clear that he cannot produce in Europe. Knocked out by Dinamo Kiev, and Sporting Lisbon in the Europa league??? Embarrassing. Only taking a point off Napoli? Embarrassing.

Or is it just me that looks at the tactics of all the managers in Europe he's faced, and think's he's been terribly out classed? Jesus Christ, he's made Frank De Boer look like a tactical genius!

If any of you have seen a manager panic and make such blatantly stupid decisions in the Champions league, I BEG YOU to post some examples.

That includes the Fiasco of swapping a striker for a defensive midfielder in Munich while 0-2 down. That includes zone-marking Ronaldo with a single fullback, and not getting our team to push out and maintain possession for five fucking minutes. That includes repeated adjustments to 3-5-2 when it has yet to work in a single fucking match. That includes changing immediately back from the 3-5-2 switch to a 4-4-2 after failing at it miserably, this of course happening in two vital Champions League matches. That includes switching to a 4-0-6 formation to try and win a Champion's league match as if we had Ajax pinned in like QPR at home. The list goes on. Never seen a single manager make such an abundance of stupid decisions that can be directly linked to failure.

But its the players' faults?
Bare with me but didn't say that you'd only recently started to follow City because of your dislike of united?
My apologies in advance if I've got the wrong person.
 
Mike D said:
After what can only be described as an humiliating night in champions league football for the club. The question I am now asking which I guessing is in back of a lot of peoples minds is this it for Macini? Is this as far as he can take us?

I think we all know why he was shown the door at Inter, and this competition has been his archilles heal? Personally I have been questioning where we go from here or a few weeks, and perhaps the coincidence that we have brought in an ex Barca honcho might be a clue for who we are looking at if the trigger is pulled.

But even if Mancini can bring us another premier league trophy this season is that gonna be enough, personally I don't think so. Right now barring a miracle of biblical proportions we are out of the champions league and that just is not good enough.

Get a grip...are you a new supporter?
 
Cleaver, Why not just lock this thread.


Its deteriorated into three kinds of posters:

1 - Silly arguing about whose a real fan or not.

2 - People with valid criticism of Mancini and his future at a club wanting knockout stage Champions League football

3 - People who think that the criticism means they want Mancini out and that we expected City to win the competition (none of which is remotely accurate).
 
Dethred said:
Cleaver, Why not just lock this thread.


Its deteriorated into three kinds of posters:

1 - Silly arguing about whose a real fan or not.

2 - People with valid criticism of Mancini and his future at a club wanting knockout stage Champions League football

3 - People who think that the criticism means they want Mancini out and that we expected City to win the competition (none of which is remotely accurate).
I can't cut 1. out sadly, just deal with it if reported, but I don't see any reason to lock a thread because of 2. and 3. If I did, I might as well lock the whole forum until after our next victory.
 
Dethred said:
Cleaver, Why not just lock this thread.


Its deteriorated into three kinds of posters:

1 - Silly arguing about whose a real fan or not.

2 - People with valid criticism of Mancini and his future at a club wanting knockout stage Champions League football

3 - People who think that the criticism means they want Mancini out and that we expected City to win the competition (none of which is remotely accurate).
It is really depressing .We tend to get carried away and forget the basics.... support the team regardless through thick and thin
 

Don't have an account? Register now and see fewer ads!

SIGN UP
Back
Top
  AdBlock Detected
Bluemoon relies on advertising to pay our hosting fees. Please support the site by disabling your ad blocking software to help keep the forum sustainable. Thanks.