Matty
Well-Known Member
Re: Isco (Part 8 (weekend saga part 3))
I never claimed to have any clue what we valued Isco at, hence the term "...for arguments sake". I also didn't say we valued him at a lower amount than Real Madrid did. I mearly stated that we would have a valuation for Isco and we wouldn't be willing to pay substantially over that if another side happened to value him higher.
Neville Kneville said:Plain Speaking said:Our reputation is not as high as it was last summer. IMO as a club we thought we had "made it" after winning the PL. Last summer we failed to improve our squad and paid the price.Matty said:We will have a valuation we have put on Isco, lets say it's £30m for arguments sake. We'll offer that much in one way or another, and we'll be willing to change the method by which Malaga get their £30m, installments, a bigger upfront payment, add-ons for achievements etc. However, if Real value him at £40m for example, and they are willing to pay that, then we won't be simply outbidding them to get the player. We'll move on and look at alternatives. This isn't Fantasy Football, or Football Manager, we're talking about extremely shrewd business men here. The days where we overpaid in terms of transfer fees and wages are gone, we don't need to do that now to attract the right calibre of player. We've established a reputation now as a side who can win major trophies, one which will be chanllenging annually for such trophies, and one which will be qualifying for Europe's top competitions. We can pay the right price, and hand out the right wages, on the right players. We won't get all our targets, but then no-one does, we need to stick to our guns and only pay what we believe is the right value.
Are we too inflexible with our decision making in player recruitment? Frequently when there is competition in a transfer, we seem to lose out.
Did the market value of Isco go up after his MoTM performances in the U21's? RM seemed to re-value Isco, did we?
Neither of you know what City are willing to pay.
There is no reason to assume it is less than Madrid are willing to pay.
I never claimed to have any clue what we valued Isco at, hence the term "...for arguments sake". I also didn't say we valued him at a lower amount than Real Madrid did. I mearly stated that we would have a valuation for Isco and we wouldn't be willing to pay substantially over that if another side happened to value him higher.