Israel-Palestine Conflict

[robbieh]

Sadly no longer with us. I read his book on debt some time ago. A good read.

 

[blueinsa]

View attachment 105544

Add France now.

Perhaps they should ignore respected intelligence sources, including their own no doubt and just get on the same social media as you guys?

Crazy how they’re not eh?

 

[The blue phantom]

Add France now.

Perhaps they should ignore respected intelligence sources, including their own no doubt and just get on the same social media as you guys?

Crazy how they’re not eh?

It's nothing to do with their own intelligence. They are literally taking the IDF's word after their interrogation of Hamas suspects.

The "IDF" respected intelligence sources. Just fuckin lol.

 

[trueblue1972]

No honestly, going back to what it is you’re desperately trying to claim, it’s the exact same as racists trying to tell us what defines racism.

Rightly, no fucker would let them do that and it’s the same with this.

The fact those that claim they only criticise keep having to mention they’re not antisemites is quite telling to be honest.

Thank fuck for the “bots” who can keep reminding them that they don’t make the rules all the time.

I'm just waiting for the Oxford English dictionary to change the meaning of Bot to 'someone who has a different opinion to myself '

 

[cucumberman]

In our country, an adult boxing a young teen is GBH



And this adult here is a uniformed person, an armed person against the armless.

This GBH is not the first, also not the first since 7 October. An adult attacking a child has been going on for decades.

I still remember an innocent young 10 year old girl, already held on ground, was rabbit punched several times. All because the young girl was shouting for freedom.

How about the other dozens of young girls being headshot sniped by IDF over the years, and always always always justified IDF that they happened in the line of fire.

Despicable disgusting decades of act that kill, all because the ‘human shields’ argument.

 

[cucumberman]

You probably need to look up the definition if you think they are not the same thing.

Holocaust Memorial Day: 'Unprecedented rise' in antisemitic incidents, charity finds

Holocaust Memorial Day marks 78 years since the Auschwitz-Birkenau concentration camp was liberated, and commemorates the millions killed by the Nazi regime.

news.sky.com

I have been off this thread topic a few days and the first I realised is this use of supporting reference being based on grey literature (i.e. media) instead of proper factual research based literature.

So, to discern the difference between Nazism and Neo-Nazism:

Nazism and Neo-Nazism are often used interchangeably, but they have distinct differences.

Nazism refers to the ideology of the National Socialist German Workers' Party (NSDAP), which was active during World War II and led by Adolf Hitler. It emphasized the superiority of the "Aryan" race and advocated for its dominance over other races. The book "The Ideology of Nazism" by Burleigh (1991) provides an in-depth analysis of the beliefs and values that underpinned Nazi ideology.

Neo-Nazism is a contemporary far-right movement that typically manifests as online hate groups or skinhead subcultures that promote white supremacy and anti-Semitism. One book worth reading is "The Return of Neo-Nazism in Europe and North America" by Wodak (2013) examines the resurgence of neo-Nazi movements since the fall of the Berlin Wall. Another book is "The Radical Right in Interwar Europe" edited by Smith (2004) which is the collection of essays that explore the historical context and ideological diversity of right-wing extremist similar to Nazism but is not Nazism per se.

if Nazism == Neo Nazism
then Haganah = IDF

Israel has always emphasised that IDF is not Haganah. While both are similar in regard to aversion of Arabs, Haganah is a militia and IDF is the official national armed forces. Thus, Nazism is the nationally accepted and military ethos old Germany, and Neo-Nazism is indoctrination against nationally accepted modern Germany.

 

[ChicagoBlue]

In our country, an adult boxing a young teen is GBH



And this adult here is a uniformed person, an armed person against the armless.

This GBH is not the first, also not the first since 7 October. An adult attacking a child has been going on for decades.

I still remember an innocent young 10 year old girl, already held on ground, was rabbit punched several times. All because the young girl was shouting for freedom.

How about the other dozens of young girls being headshot sniped by IDF over the years, and always always always justified IDF that they happened in the line of fire.

Despicable disgusting decades of act that kill, all because the ‘human shields’ argument.

In a world of guerilla warfare, where children wear IEDs and are spotters for their masters, there is no “nonchalantly hanging out on a street corner.”

Equating that with “in our country that’s GBH,” is naive nonsense. Uniform or no uniform, everyone is a threat.

 

[cucumberman]

Don’t fret, Muslim nations will cover the shortfall.

China and Russia will pump the cash in surely?

They will won’t they?

Muslim nations, when they provide financial aid - and they have been for decades - prefer to not declare spotlight recognition or in emblazoned big signs. That’s because showing off is against the fundamental of Islam which is a term they emphasise as ‘Riya’. Riya means donating (including financial donations) that are pleasing to their God with the intention of seeking admiration from others. Hence which is why Muslim nations are against Riya.

Just an example on an individual Muslim level, who helped Barclays Bank from bankruptcy with nary a word on that individual’s national papers? Word got out that it’s our papers though, but he kept mum about it.

 

[cucumberman]

In a world of guerilla warfare, where children wear IEDs and are spotters for their masters, there is no “nonchalantly hanging out on a street corner.”

Equating that with “in our country that’s GBH,” is naive nonsense. Uniform or no uniform, everyone is a threat.

1. So you conclude by that video alone that that child is a definite IED wearer? Hence why he was punched several times?

2. Everyone is a threat includes every child is a threat? If you have a child on the streets and an officer conduct that exact same attack in that video, it’s fair-dos to you? You did say ‘everyone’ so that includes your country your rules.

 

[halfcenturyup]

1. So you conclude by that video alone that that child is a definite IED wearer? Hence why he was punched several times?

2. Everyone is a threat includes every child is a threat? If you have a child on the streets and an officer conduct that exact same attack in that video, it’s fair-dos to you? You did say ‘everyone’ so that includes your country your rules.

I get the idea about the "fog of war" but I especially like the idea that, after you decide someone may be wearing an IED, you go up and punch him a few times. Or, if you think someone is a spotter for a sniper, for example, you casually walk up to him and then start punching him :) We all know there are some issues around their rules of engagement, but really.

If the soldier was that close to the kid, it's much more likely the soldier wasn't getting the respect he wanted and reacted, in my view. I would imagine it is happening all the time and happens pretty much all the time in all occupied territories, which is why the UN doesn't like them.