Don Karleone
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 8 Nov 2008
- Messages
- 21,269
- Team supported
- Vampire Squid FC
No. But it's clear Civilian casualty is not their goal. Even if success at avoiding it is poor.
Bullshit.
No. But it's clear Civilian casualty is not their goal. Even if success at avoiding it is poor.
If you are into those pesky things called facts then perhaps you shouldn't engage in hyperbole. The entire Jewish race is not being accused of things they aren't guilty of. The nation of Israel and it's army the IDF are being accused of things.You just accused a country of breaking all the international rules in the book but then admit you can't name a single specific law they are breaking. That's hatred in my book. I like to deal in those pesky little things called facts. I know they are annoying, but when I feel the entire jewish race is being unfairly accused of things they aren't guilty of, whilst fighting an enemy who as recently as yesterday evening stated on TV they wanted to keep repeating the Oct 7th masssacre until all jews are destroyed, it seems reasonable to want to stick to facts. Or do you not agree ?
The repetitive nature of your denials leads me to believe that you probably think Hamas are dedicated to peace and love.The big picture here is that Israel has been using Hamas attacks as a way of stealthily taking more and more of the land of Palestine, which according to some sources is their plan all along.
The one thing you are correct about is that Hamas are a nasty bunch, nurtured and funded by the Israelis.
The human shield bollocks again. Gaza is very densely populated, how could it be otherwise.
The repetitive nature of your posts leads me to think your account might have been hijacked by a teenager in a Tel Aviv bedroom.
They'll waste money on it anyway. And it wouldn't have mattered what the IDF did or did not do, recruiting campaigns don't need facts to thrive. They need emotional claims.Hamas/ISIS/Hezbollah don’t even need to waste money on recruiting campaigns if the IDF does it for them.
No. But it's clear Civilian casualty is not their goal. Even if success at avoiding it is poor.
I did read it out of courtesy. You'll see near the end of the article the writer points out that the densely populated nature of Gaza means that Hamas militants will be milling around with the general populace unavoidably.Here's the Guardian's take on Human Shields. It's not exactly a publication known for it's pro-Israeli stance, so one assumes you'll think it has some relevance https://www.theguardian.com/world/2...under-hospital-palestinian-civilian-gaza-city
Well that was concise :)Bullshit.
I don't. But you and I are going round in circles. In a civilized way I should add.The repetitive nature of your denials leads me to believe that you probably think Hamas are dedicated to peace and love.
You said you had zero sympathy for Israel the day after 1400 people were murdered there and you’ve been spouting bile about Israel ever since without being in full possession of the facts.I am promoting hate ? Fucking hell