But this was recorded. Extensively. On CCTV. And there were witnesses. Lots of them. The police reviewed the plentiful evidence and determined there was nothing to investigate and that poppy-sellers are not at risk.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
Israel-Palestine Conflict
- Thread starter The blue phantom
- Start date
But this was recorded. Extensively. On CCTV. And there were witnesses. Lots of them. The police reviewed the plentiful evidence and determined there was nothing to investigate and that poppy-sellers are not at risk.
When city's bus was attacked by Liverpool fans the Police didn't need to look at CCTV because it was broadcasted live on Sky.I'd like to know how you conclude that it was 'completely invented'. It clearly says that there is not enough evidence to take the investigation further, it does not mean that it never happened. It means that it is not clear on the CCTV, and that no one admitted to it, or was prepared to come forward to witness it.
If only buglaries, pick pocketing, mugging etc, etc never happened because it was never recorded or witnessed hey, it'd be a near crime free world !
The alleged offenders then went to a live football match where Liverpool FC could (if asked) pull up every single person's seat number, name and address.
The Police failed to identify or arrest a single person... Sort of proves a lot.
inchy14
Well-Known Member
A bloke searching any young girl is bang out of order!!It’s a pat down/frisk, not a humiliating body search and if it is a schoolgirl on the way to school, the video we see is no real proof of that claim is it?
I wonder if everyone will be admonished on here like yourself for commenting on misinformation?I'd like to know how you conclude that it was 'completely invented'. It clearly says that there is not enough evidence to take the investigation further, it does not mean that it never happened. It means that it is not clear on the CCTV, and that no one admitted to it, or was prepared to come forward to witness it.
If only buglaries, pick pocketing, mugging etc, etc never happened because it was never recorded or witnessed hey, it'd be a near crime free world !
MouldensChippy
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 21 Aug 2008
- Messages
- 1,121
Suiting your narrative doesn't make it so !After listening to all the reports this morning and the witnesses around whatever incident occurred its pretty obvious he wasn't attacked, That's without the unlimited amount of CCTV footage which has confirmed it. So basically it's only the Sun & Mails headline that states it happened.
If it were so obvious, the man would be charged with wasting Police time, would he not ?
If we're talking of things being extensively covered on CCTV, why was no scouser identified/arrested for for the injury inflicted by dropping a pot full of coins onto a young female supprter at the Etihad ?
Ducado
Well-Known Member
Given how concerned you 2 were about the poppy seller being beaten up, and how @BlueAnorak just knew it was inevitable... you might like to know it seems to have been completely invented.
To be fair they posted what they read, I was a little cautious when I saw it, this is the danger of posting things from your own bubble, you are not going to post it if it doesn’t fit in with your worldview
Given how concerned you 2 were about the poppy seller being beaten up, and how @BlueAnorak just knew it was inevitable... you might like to know it seems to have been completely invented.
If he was not beaten up, and it certainly looks that way, then I have no problem apologising. I think anyone who does post lies, propaganda etc should be called out, even if it's me!
Last edited:
Given how concerned you 2 were about the poppy seller being beaten up, and how @BlueAnorak just knew it was inevitable... you might like to know it seems to have been completely invented.
Seemingly invented and insufficient evidence are not the same.
Here's one I've been thinking about. Suella Braverman made one of her shock jock statements a few months ago where she called refugees 'invaders' and, not surprisingly, was met with a barrage of criticism.
My question is "How do the Palestine people and supporters view Israelis?"
For instance do you see them as 'immigrants with equal rights as the incumbent population', 'immigrants who are subordinate to the incumbent population', people who have a legal historic right to the land, refugees seeking a path from persecution, an alien people who are trying to take someone else's land (Invaders) or something else?
My question is "How do the Palestine people and supporters view Israelis?"
For instance do you see them as 'immigrants with equal rights as the incumbent population', 'immigrants who are subordinate to the incumbent population', people who have a legal historic right to the land, refugees seeking a path from persecution, an alien people who are trying to take someone else's land (Invaders) or something else?
Tim of the Oak
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 29 Dec 2012
- Messages
- 18,462
What a fooking joke.So it was the Mail and Sun who splashed all over the front page about the Elderly Poppy seller being beaten up by Pro Palestinian folk. After all cctv reviewed nothing at all found and case closed. The shit these Right Wing papers have caused again.