Blue Phil said:
I'm not disappointed because he only cost £8million. I'm disappointed because he's not very good, and not good enough to lace AJs boots. Funny you should mention Bale though, who is on an entirely different planet to this kid.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
It's quiet 10, no apologies! (continued)
- Thread starter ElanJo
- Start date
- Status
- Not open for further replies.
I'm not disappointed because he only cost £8million. I'm disappointed because he's not very good, and not good enough to lace AJs boots. Funny you should mention Bale though, who is on an entirely different planet to this kid.
BenchillBlue
Well-Known Member
Couldn't agree more, the whole transfer forum is embarrassing at times. I bet the none registered reader looking in on the forum laugh at the way some carry on.waspish said:Some spoiled Brats on here..
BlueCityfan
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 15 Feb 2011
- Messages
- 5,524
I'd take any premier league winger over Adam fucking Johnson...he is so shit it's unreal.
But if Sinclair is the alternative to Hazard it is a bit underwhelming for sure.<br /><br />-- Tue Aug 07, 2012 10:19 am --<br /><br />I'd take any premier league winger over Adam fucking Johnson...he is so shit it's unreal.
But if Sinclair is the alternative to Hazard it is a bit underwhelming for sure.
But if Sinclair is the alternative to Hazard it is a bit underwhelming for sure.<br /><br />-- Tue Aug 07, 2012 10:19 am --<br /><br />I'd take any premier league winger over Adam fucking Johnson...he is so shit it's unreal.
But if Sinclair is the alternative to Hazard it is a bit underwhelming for sure.
Blue Phil said:Do not be dissapointed just because he is only £8million. Kompany, Hart and Clichey were all bought for peanuts and have been unbelievable.
Sinclair has pace, skill and an eye for goal. He is 23 so is ready to slot straight in to the first team. I would much rather us buy Sinclair then spend £40million on injury prone-inconsistant Bale. Now all we need is a defender (Agger) and the squad is sorted.
I'm not disappointed because he only cost £8million. I'm disappointed because he's not very good, and not good enough to lace AJs boots. Funny you should mention Bale though, who is on an entirely different planet to this kid.
BenchillBlue
Well-Known Member
Couldn't agree more, the whole transfer forum is embarrassing at times. I bet the none registered reader looking in on the forum laugh at the way some carry on.waspish said:Some spoiled Brats on here..
Bill
Moderator
sorry but i'd have aj all day long.
BillyShears
Well-Known Member
hgblue said:Blue Phil said:Do not be dissapointed just because he is only £8million. Kompany, Hart and Clichey were all bought for peanuts and have been unbelievable.
Sinclair has pace, skill and an eye for goal. He is 23 so is ready to slot straight in to the first team. I would much rather us buy Sinclair then spend £40million on injury prone-inconsistant Bale. Now all we need is a defender (Agger) and the squad is sorted.
I'm not disappointed because he only cost £8million. I'm disappointed because he's not very good, and not good enough to lace AJs boots. Funny you should mention Bale though, who is on an entirely different planet to this kid.
Disagree with you on this. Sinclair is by no means world class or the finished article, but he's a better all round footballer than AJ is in my opinion. Certainly he's a welcome addition in a position where we have needed someone to give us a different dimension, particularly as a left sided attacking wide player.
- Status
- Not open for further replies.