So let me get this straight, some blues think we should bring Saka in and ditch Palmer?
It's a hard pass for me.
Saka isn't at the level either, talented but a long way to go in my eyes. So what would be the point in spending whatever inflated fee it would cost, whilst ousting one of our own to give him the chance instead? Where is the rush, Palmer has only just started being eased into the first team and the signs have been encouraging.
As for comparing Palmer to other players who came through. Some of them don't belong in the same conversation but of those that do, how many of them bar Foden were given a real chance? Maybe City as a club, have needed to improve their approach to it. I also don't think it's as simple as some are making out anyway. You never know how much of their potential a player will reach, until you give them to chance to prove themselves(a proper go at it, not just a couple of cup games). Predicting whether they will continue to level up or plateaux soon after they turn pro, is like trying to predict the weather years in advance, impossible. The second law of thermodynamics, chaos theory, the butterfly effect all follow a similar train of thought, the smallest of things can make a huge difference long term. That's why it's so hit and miss with bringing players through IMO.
How many times have we heard some of the greats talk about how they weren't the most talented in their age group but they went the furthest? Breakout seasons can happen at many different ages too, granted the club has to have a cut off point(sell with a buyback clause) but 20 seems excessive.
Pep clearly sees something in him. He was showing signs of having the right attitude(unfazed, surrounded by and competing against, seasoned pros too). He was being picked, then got unlucky with injuries and the end of the season was really close, which was a real shame for him.