wolviedinho
Well-Known Member
ESPN reporting that City only want to pay £30m for Cucu.No wonder it’s dragging on. A £20m difference is quite a lot. I can see us walking away. The report could of course be nonsense.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
It's Quiet 17 - Glory Thread
- Thread starter tolmie's hairdoo
- Start date
Man I remember how everyone said not having a striker will bite us in the ass. 93 pointe and 99 goals later..
In the league it didn’t but in the later stages of the champions league it literally did bite us in the ass against Madrid. Did not have a clinical enough player to punish Madrid. We created a lot of opportunities that could’ve seen a cricket score with a striker.
It depends upon your definition of ITKThen why do people get so pissed off when anyone points out that it shouldn't be taken seriously?
If we're saying ITKs shouldn't be taken seriously then surely we have to also acknowledge that their information isn't above being treated with scepticism.
jimmy blue shoes
Well-Known Member
Man I remember how everyone said not having a striker will bite us in the ass. 93 pointe and 99 goals later..
A striker may have killed Real Madrid off in the first leg though! Just sayin'.
jimmy blue shoes
Well-Known Member
In the league it didn’t but in the later stages of the champions league it literally did bite us in the ass against Madrid. Did not have a clinical enough player to punish Madrid. We created a lot of opportunities that could’ve seen a cricket score with a striker.
Beat me to it!!!
yeah whatever !!
Well-Known Member
Three liverpool strikers couldnt even score against Madrid.. just sayin' ;)A striker may have killed Real Madrid off in the first leg though! Just sayin'.
blueparrot
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 7 Jun 2012
- Messages
- 29,416
Think the main reason we lost was we ran out of defenders not that we didn't score enough.In the league it didn’t but in the later stages of the champions league it literally did bite us in the ass against Madrid. Did not have a clinical enough player to punish Madrid. We created a lot of opportunities that could’ve seen a cricket score with a striker.
samuelyeboah
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 21 May 2021
- Messages
- 5,469
- Team supported
- Manchester City
no it didn't ffs. Please understand the role of chance in football. We could have had a clinical striker and still not qualifyIn the league it didn’t but in the later stages of the champions league it literally did bite us in the ass against Madrid. Did not have a clinical enough player to punish Madrid. We created a lot of opportunities that could’ve seen a cricket score with a striker.
Last season, like almost every season under pep, was a huge success.
Man I remember how everyone said not having a striker will bite us in the ass. 93 pointe and 99 goals later..
Predicted back in August that we were going to score 100 league goals without a striker. Still depressed we scored only 99, even though the greatest ever sides of Ferguson and Klopp never scored even 98 :)
jimmy blue shoes
Well-Known Member
Three liverpool strikers couldnt even score against Madrid.. just sayin' ;)
Liverpool didn't create nearly half the chances we did in the first half alone! Just sayin'.