It's Quiet - a new dawn

Status
Not open for further replies.
Did Abramovic also make Chinese clubs pay £25m for Ighalo, or £40m for jackson Martinez, or £47m for hulk?

And isn't it funny, considering The chinese are all scheming to get Chelsea money, that Chelsea didn't sign Alex Pato for peanuts just before his move to China, that was Villarreal...

Chelsea's good "luck" with the Chinese is simply them making sure their players know taking it is their best option when an offer arrives. We should have done the same with Bony when we had the chance in January.

The players you mention have nothing to do with PL---just because some of the deals are genuine doesn't mean all of them are--we couldn't sell Bony because we haven't got Romans connections---you really think we go out of our way not to sell our players for as much as we can
 
I agree. I find it fascinating it's the one position we have no credible links to a player in. Would love it to be Fabinho but it feels like he's going to United and that's all i've heard. We're seemingly not in for Bakayoko. Can't see Dortmund selling Weigl, especially if they sell Auba. It's a hard position to fill because of the skill set required.

why the fuck would fabinho want the rags??
 
It's a daft conspiracy theory. No idea why anyone would waste their time trying to convince anyone that it's true. But okay each to their own I suppose. I've read worse/weirder/dafter on here for sure!

Conspiracy theory ?---It's hardly JFK is it
 


What about that ? Any reason for concerning ?


Sanchez talking to Bayern isn't new information really, though unfortunately some will see this tweet and think Sanchez is off to Munich.

Two things:
1. No source for Chilean players in Europe is as nailed on as Maks Cardenas, who broke Bravo to City last year. He says Sanchez wants City.
2. Remember what @tolmie's hairdoo said? No matter what you may hear between now and the summer, don't give up on Sanchez.
 
The problem we have with Sanchez is if Wenger sells to us they risk a fan revolt.

It's too risky for Wenger.
 
so fabinho cant choose who he signs for??

Haha. Of course he can. I was just being facetious. The truth is I've got no idea where he's gonna end up, but I've not really heard from anyone i've spoken to that City have anything which could be constituted as a 'serious' interest. United on the other hand are said to be balls deep for the lad. I hope i'm very very very wrong.
 
The problem we have with Sanchez is if Wenger sells to us they risk a fan revolt.

It's too risky for Wenger.

I mean, the fans are already revolting, pun intended. If Wenger signs an extension then it'll be mutiny no matter who he brings in or sells.

On top of that, Kroenke will sell to the highest bidder always, because he actually doesn't give two shits about anything other than money.
 
I mean, the fans are already revolting, pun intended. If Wenger signs an extension then it'll be mutiny no matter who he brings in or sells.

On top of that, Kroenke will sell to the highest bidder always, because he actually doesn't give two shits about anything other than money.

Innit. The bottom line is that this is a game to extract maximum money out of City imo. They know where Sanchez wants to go and it's rare that players in the position Sanchez are in don't get to choose where they go next.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Don't have an account? Register now and see fewer ads!

SIGN UP
Back
Top
  AdBlock Detected
Bluemoon relies on advertising to pay our hosting fees. Please support the site by disabling your ad blocking software to help keep the forum sustainable. Thanks.