Fordyboy46
Well-Known Member
No shit there, what an exclusive that is. Must follow on twitter
His source knew we were withdrawing before we announced we were joining? Astonishing !!!!
We don’t “have to pay” if the prices are to high.
That’s how we ended up with Dias.
I think Grealish isn’t far off, he’s probably worth £70m-£80m, so to get them to sell £100m I can see it, I think he’d be i good fit even though I’m not a fan.
Kane I think is £80m, so I get the £100m bid.
Though I’m of the belief he’ll cost £130m+, probably nearer to Levy’s £150m valuation.
At which point he doesn’t seem to be good value for money and not a good fit.
All just in my humble opinion.
For a negotiating team that has nda around its processes it is certainly strange to hear anything during any talks let alone limitless cash.“Money is no issue”
Great negotiating tactic that.
No wonder we’re getting quoted £100m for Grealish and £150m for Kane.
If only they had told City beforehand, we'd never had joined in the first place.His source knew we were withdrawing before we announced we were joining? Astonishing !!!!
I think that's what we actually need in the final 3rd, the unpredictability and bit of a maverick if you like.I’m surprised that we’re linked with Grealish. He’s extremely talented but a bit individualistic as he slows the game down by holding onto the ball. He reminds me a bit of Nasri and it doesn’t seem very Pep.
The persistent play acting, playing up to the camera and off the field antics perhaps. Good player though.How can you not be a fan of Grealish after what he’s done at Villa?