Totally agree. Personally, I'd take adding just Danny bloody Ings, and keeping fhem two, than Kane and Grealish instead of those two. Which I just don't think improves us. Not without an additional top forward.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
It's Quiet Thread 15 - Txiki Blinders
- Thread starter tolmie's hairdoo
- Start date
- Status
- Not open for further replies.
Totally agree. Personally, I'd take adding just Danny bloody Ings, and keeping fhem two, than Kane and Grealish instead of those two. Which I just don't think improves us. Not without an additional top forward.
mosssideblue
Well-Known Member
You really are childish in your postsThe problem is the t-shirt looks old and too small for his growing waste line
This is like arguing the playstyle of two teams, one playing exciting football but not quite there while one playing boring/ugly/stale but getting results. I know which one I'd settle for.
No because that's a bullshit false equivalence and you know it.
Haaland has scored 57 goals in 59 games. That is results.
The choice is exciting player who's getting results, or boring player who's getting results.
If you prefer Kane, fine, but don't blame people for being more interested in another option.
He looks like he’s ageing quickly, injuries look like they’re catching up with him, just like Sergio, though Sergio still had a power run in him.Ridiculous amounts of excuses flying in on this very thread and some people just can`t help themselves in looking for negatives all the time.
He’s slow, not sure anyone can disagree with that.
He also spends a large part of the game jogging around the pitch, jogging to press, half arsed most of the time, in the fact he hardly ever actually presses anyone, apart from when he try’s to cripple someone.
He drops deep, lays the ball off and when it breaks and ends up in the box, he ain’t there.
He doesn’t put a shift in over 90 minutes.
We’ve seen in every England game and you see it in Spurs games too.
He’s scores and everyone thinks he’s had a great game.
He may be only 28, but his all round game makes him look like a 32 year old.
Don't put words into peoples mouths.It's become the @keeper whinging site.
If we sign both Kane and Grealish and fail to win the league next season, it looks like you are saying it will be because of those two signings, is that correct?
I said if we pay 200m on those two or any other two players , if we were not to win the league it would be a major disappointment.
Once you start paying 100m for any individualy the expectation gets crazy.
Our owners want Champions League success, we all do, that's the ultimate target, as well as continuing to dominate the domestic game.
then please feel free to stop reading and replyingYou really are childish in your posts
And Kane had 37 direct goal involvements in 35 games, also playing in a much more competitive and respectable league.No because that's a bullshit false equivalence and you know it.
Haaland has scored 57 goals in 59 games. That is results.
This is the same Bundesliga that made fucking Paco Alcacer look like a world beater, same league Werner scored 30 in before moving to Chelsea? no thanks. I'd rather settle for the better/experienced option.
mosssideblue
Well-Known Member
Not putting words in anyone's mouth. You said if we sign those two we "HAVE" to win the league.Don't put words into peoples mouths.
I said if we pay 200m on those two or any other two players , if we were not to win the league it would be a major disappointment.
Once you start paying 100m for any individualy the expectation gets crazy.
Our owners want Champions League success, we all do, that's the ultimate target, as well as continuing to dominate the domestic game.
We scouted Bony too.Like the scouting team that bought Rodwell , RSC and let's not forget Mendy.
Kane is not slow?
If Arry signs, next season we could play 50 plus games, does he look a player that could handle that? I am not convinced he could.
I have said many times , whoever this club signs I will back fully and I am sure we all would, but he has not yet signed and this is a debate on his capabilities.
It's not the Harry and Jack fan boy site.
Now he was slow and lazy.
No option on here, it's not allowed, pathetic when it ends up in name calling because you have a differing opinion of a player from another club.No because that's a bullshit false equivalence and you know it.
Haaland has scored 57 goals in 59 games. That is results.
The choice is exciting player who's getting results, or boring player who's getting results.
If you prefer Kane, fine, but don't blame people for being more interested in another option.
- Status
- Not open for further replies.