It's Quiet Thread 15 - Txiki Blinders

Status
Not open for further replies.
Well according to the rumours on here and in the press, we're trying to buy two players for a combined fee which is more than that. So i would say yes.
As we don't really need Grealish, let's tell those greedy clubs to fucking do one and just get the player that we all want and need
We aren't though sounds like we buy Grealish with any Bernardo money plus a bit and have a budget of £100 mill for a striker. Doubt our net spend will be above £120 ish not counting any fringe sales.
 
Well according to the rumours on here and in the press, we're trying to buy two players for a combined fee which is more than that. So i would say yes.
As we don't really need Grealish, let's tell those greedy clubs to fucking do one and just get the player that we all want and need
The key to that, of course, is whether Bernardo has asked to leave.
 
Levy the predictable idiot. Let’s hope he keeps a disaffected player with descending value and remains the custodian of a cash guzzling white elephant of an stadium asset as he rocks gently in a straight jacket in the empty cheese room.
 
We aren't though sounds like we buy Grealish with any Bernardo money plus a bit and have a budget of £100 mill for a striker. Doubt our net spend will be above £120 ish not counting any fringe sales.
If Villa are going to play hardball we may not get him either.

But we need a striker more than any other, so if the stance of these clubs makes us change our position so be it.

It sounds like Bernie wants to leave and we have other players who's price will add to the kitty, so if we go all in for just Haaland, our total spend will be around £50m
 
If Villa are going to play hardball we may not get him either.

But we need a striker more than any other, so if the stance of these clubs makes us change our position so be it.

It sounds like Bernie wants to leave and we have other players who's price will add to the kitty, so if we go all in for just Haaland, our total spend will be around £50m
How hard is it to believe that we want Kane, not Haaland?
 
If Villa are going to play hardball we may not get him either.

But we need a striker more than any other, so if the stance of these clubs makes us change our position so be it.

It sounds like Bernie wants to leave and we have other players who's price will add to the kitty, so if we go all in for just Haaland, our total spend will be around £50m
If the club decide to go that way fine, but there is no ‘should’ I’m comfortable the club will do what they do and whatever that is we’ll most likely be fine.
 
Lots of rumors over Koundé, Thuram and a couple others being on Spurs transfer wishlist with serious interest. Where is that money coming from I wonder?
Kounde looks a very good prospect.....I think he was considered before we got Dias.
 
How hard is it to believe that we want Kane, not Haaland?
Oh i believe we do, but are we going to be held to ransom? I'd think not.

My point is that if Levy is going to be a dick about it and keeps upping the price then we leave it and move on.

The 'report' suggest £170m or £100m plus players, if that is remotely true then i would prefer we spend £150m on Haaland.
 
Its amazing how many people have such a throbbing hard-on for Haaland, so much so they want to disregard Kane at every opportunity.

It would be great if we sign either of them, I am happy for the club and to decide and not winge and moan if they decide to go for either one or the other, that being said I will moan if we dont replace Kun at all!
 
Oh i believe we do, but are we going to be held to ransom? I'd think not.

My point is that if Levy is going to be a dick about it and keeps upping the price then we leave it and move on.

The 'report' suggest £170m or £100m plus players, if that is remotely true then i would prefer we spend £150m on Haaland.
Truth and Twitter don't generally go hand in hand.
 
How hard is it to believe that we want Kane, not Haaland?

Relatively hard, not just on the logic of it itself, which fairly obviously favours haaland, but also the pattern of club transfers and profiles of players thetnwould bid for.

I can believe it, obviously. But I can also easily believe otherwise.
 
Its amazing how many people have such a throbbing hard-on for Haaland, so much so they want to disregard Kane at every opportunity.

It would be great if we sign either of them, I am happy for the club and to decide and not winge and moan if they decide to go for either one or the other, that being said I will moan if we dont replace Kun at all!

I'd be happy with either too.

The discussion is more on yhe fact many have taken it for granted we have already signed kane, because he said some basic typical stuff to gary neville, that nothing else can be considered.

Long summer, long way to go before big money changes hands, can easily switch back and forth between the two, or someone else a few times and land on any of them by the time the window is over.
 
£170m?
I was wrong, Levy really has gone soft.
Soft in the fucking head
 

Attachments

  • 440BBCFB-61A6-453B-BE9B-C304D59A8E52.png
    440BBCFB-61A6-453B-BE9B-C304D59A8E52.png
    113.1 KB · Views: 36
Imagine haaland hearing of our kane approach first and then we come crawling...with chelsea also making it clear from pretty much day 1 of the window they want only him.

Sometimes i think we are seriously lacking when it comes to transfer strategy. I know you cant believe everything but still. A 20 year old city fan and monster dripping with personiality and arrogance(something we sorely lack on the field at times), vs a striker the wrong side of his 20's(looking it too at the euro's) with injury niggles and forvever known as "one of their own" at spurs.

God i hope spurs continue to play hardball and force us toward haaland.

Kane would be a good addition no doubt but when you have the next big thing after ronaldo and messi also available....just wtf.
 
Imagine haaland hearing of our kane approach first and then we come crawling...with chelsea also making it clear from pretty much day 1 of the window they want only him.

Sometimes i think we are seriously lacking when it comes to transfer strategy. I know you cant believe everything but still. A 20 year old city fan and monster dripping with personiality and arrogance(something we sorely lack on the field at times), vs a striker the wrong side of his 20's(looking it too at the euro's) with injury niggles and forvever known as "one of their own" at spurs.

God i hope spurs continue to play hardball and force us toward haaland.

Kane would be a good addition no doubt but when you have the next big thing after ronaldo and messi also available....just wtf.
Good attempt and you nearly got me I have to admit. I am sure some will bite.
 
Imagine haaland hearing of our kane approach first and then we come crawling...with chelsea also making it clear from pretty much day 1 of the window they want only him.

Sometimes i think we are seriously lacking when it comes to transfer strategy. I know you cant believe everything but still. A 20 year old city fan and monster dripping with personiality and arrogance(something we sorely lack on the field at times), vs a striker the wrong side of his 20's(looking it too at the euro's) with injury niggles and forvever known as "one of their own" at spurs.

God i hope spurs continue to play hardball and force us toward haaland.

Kane would be a good addition no doubt but when you have the next big thing after ronaldo and messi also available....just wtf.
Or...imagine Haaland finding out we've moved on to Kane because of his excessive demands (allegedly)
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Don't have an account? Register now and see fewer ads!

SIGN UP
Back
Top