bluemoonmatt
Well-Known Member
Everything in the article is not factually wrong but I fail to lower myself to dipper standard, and be outraged. I just think Milner has not really done much wrong, he ran his contract down resulting in no fee being recieved but he is entitled to do so and should we not point the finger at the execs that allowed it to happen. He sought more playing time in a favoured position, he's again entitled to do that and the fact it hasn't worked out like that is not necessarily Milners fault. He took a signing on fee, I've yet to see many occasions whereby a player has turned one down and he's talked up his current employers which again isn't exactly unheard of. My only beef on the matter is not with Milner but with our great british press whom chose to have a polar opposite reporting slant when comparing with Ster, but lets be honest, thats just standard. I'll happily berate ex players when they have genuinely belittled or besmirched our fine club.