NQCitizen
Well-Known Member
silvasleftleg said:cfn1963 said:I can see the value of Garcia when we have the ball, but a primary role of a defensive midfielder is to stop attacks and win the ball back. Garcia rarely gets near the player in possession but simply drifts around in the gap between them and the defence, often following the ball rather than monitoring the attacker running past him. This might occasionally stop opponents sliding passes in the gaps between our defenders but is that enough? Would it not be better to have a De Jong-type snapper there?
every player is valuable to a certain extent. but not every player is crucial to our season.
when garcia comes on, he does a decent job, he doesn't do anything magnicicient or special.
-- Wed Jan 15, 2014 6:03 pm --
NQCitizen said:silvasleftleg said:Wether he trusts him or not is irrelevant. What he MP asks him to do is also irrelevant. My opinion is that we can do without him.
Will our season be affected if Garcia leaves ? No.
Well apart from the fact we'll only have two central midfielders and we can't bring on our managers first choice (possibly only) choice substitute when he wants to close out the game, maybe.
If our manager's plans are irrelevant then I can't see how you really measure the effects of anything. Selling Aguero would have no effect if Pellegrini did not play him, but he does so it's very relevant and selling Aguero would have a huge effect.
no that's not true. milner, kompany and demichelis can play midfield.
So our season wouldn't be affected by selling Garcia and putting our best defender in midfield for no apparent reason?
In big games to close out we either put our hardest working wide midfielder in the centre, or move one our first choice defenders further up the pitch?
Pellegrini's instructions may be irrelevant to you, but most would agree they're not that absurd.