OB1 said:
Shaelumstash said:
Now, let's say him and De Jong have the same pass completion percentage of 92%, how would a statistician with no knowledge of the game be able to deduce who had "better distribution" (which was the subject of the original discussion)?
As far as I'm aware statistics will not be able to demonstrate how Xavi controls games with his passing, or how De Jong slowed us down with his. The statistics are fairly useful for certain things, but they completely pale in to insignificance in comparison with watching a player regularly with an educated eye.
Yeah, yeah, stats are quantitative rather than qualitative but the original discussion wasn't comparing Xavi with 92% to NDJ with 92% but NDJ's 92% to Garcia's 82%; which simply raises question marks about what exactly justified the opinion first given.
I didn't see any stats in the original discussion. Someone said Garcia's distribution was "better" than De Jong's. you said he was wrong based solely on tje quantative evidence. My point all the way through is that "better" has to take in to account qualative as well as well as quantative.
On a side note, I'm not saying Garcia's qualitive is better than De Jong's yet because I've not seen enough of him, but it's certainly an area of De Jong's game thatI thought could be improved upon.