Who would be a No. 2 for Fernandinho, and would be willing to be a No. 2?Ric said:Marvin said:Defensive midfielder - we need more than Fernandinho so why should we sell him?
If we were to sell him, we'd have to bring someone else in. Why would we do that?
Because we could bring in someone better?
Marvin said:Who would be a No. 2 for Fernandinho, and would be willing to be a No. 2?Ric said:Marvin said:Defensive midfielder - we need more than Fernandinho so why should we sell him?
If we were to sell him, we'd have to bring someone else in. Why would we do that?
Because we could bring in someone better?
Ric said:Marvin said:Who would be a No. 2 for Fernandinho, and would be willing to be a No. 2?Ric said:Because we could bring in someone better?
It's a squad game these days, so anyone brought in would get their share of games. There seems little logic in your reasoning for keeping Garcia.
SrilankanBlue said:@Squawka 24m
Javi Garcia won an enormous 12 aerial duels against Crystal Palace, more than any other player in the PL today.
Ineffective at what? Opening up a packed defence? That's not his gameTonyM said:Looked decent when not under pressure. When actually needed to me he was completely ineffective again.
Hope City find him a club in a league that suits his abilities.
Marvin said:Ineffective at what?
I accept he isn't great going forward, but there were plenty of occasions where he accurately switched the play with lengthy passes to Milner or Navas.FantasyIreland said:Marvin said:Ineffective at what?
Anything other than a 5yrd pass backwards or sideways when he has time and space to do so or winning a few headers.
And as for a replacement for Fernandinho - a proper midfielder..... don't make me piss.
We need players with strings to their bow and the ability to step up and adapt or,in other words,the polar opposite to this bloke