chris85mcfc
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 28 Jun 2013
- Messages
- 5,677
Chippy_boy said:chris85mcfc said:Chippy_boy said:No it's not, it's a totally rubbish post.
If Milner wants to leave, fucking well man up and say so. It's not like the club have shafted him in any way, and trying to fuck us over is completely and utterly bang out of order. And dragging this on and on and on until he can leave on a free is, make no mistake, fucking us over.
Tough, the club have left themselves in this position. If you're happy for the club to let one of our assets go into the last 12 months of his contract with everything up in the air then that's what you've got, and this is now the fall out.
I've said time and time again, once you leave it open in a players last year then the club lose all bargaining chips.
This 'the club took his word for it' is beyond stupidity. We're talking multi million pound contracts, since when do you just take someones word for it.
I agree the club were stupid mate, but that doesn't justify someone shafting them - I think your logic is flawed there.
It might explain the situation, but it goes nowhere in terms of justifying Milners actions as being "OK". If you go out and leave your house unlocked, burglary is not perfectly acceptable.
I don't get how he has shafted the club tho? I really don't get it.
He has been offered a contract, we are lead to believe that he told them last summer that if he is seen to be playing more football then he will sign.
The only way i can try and highlight the point is, would City allow Silva, Vinny or Sergio to go into the last year of their contract and risk losing them for free, even if they gave their word that they would sign?
No way, and thats purely down to them being a more valuable asset to the squad and in monetary terms to the club. We ran the risk with Milner because we clearly didn't feel like we would be losing much in value to the squad or in monetary terms, and we've been burned. Eeeez football.