joe hart

Status
Not open for further replies.
George Hannah said:
stonerblue said:
Blue Haze said:
Superb post
what happened to the vids of all the other Hart errors? He put about 8 up.
Joe's show trial has been edited for knockers with short attention spans

and you shortened it even further strangely...

clearly the ... underneath the second vid signified he was saving space by not quoting every vid again, which was a nice gesture in keeping the thread tidy.
 
JoeMercer'sWay said:
George Hannah said:
stonerblue said:
what happened to the vids of all the other Hart errors? He put about 8 up.
Joe's show trial has been edited for knockers with short attention spans

and you shortened it even further strangely...

clearly the ... underneath the second vid signified he was saving space by not quoting every vid again, which was a nice gesture in keeping the thread tidy.
some of us Joe loyalists have short attention spans too ;-)
 
Peter Schmeichel via BBC, rag or fuckwit?
<a class="postlink" href="http://www.bbc.co.uk/sport/0/football/24875994" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;">http://www.bbc.co.uk/sport/0/football/24875994</a>
 
lasereyes said:
There's also his error against Real Madrid which cost us a point last season that could have changed our CL campaign.

You cant forget his brilliance in the championship season, but his confidence his shot now. I'd give him at least 2-3 months on the bench and allow him to reset his engine and come back hungrier.
Oh, you mean the game where without his brilliance we'd have been 4 down by half time? And where Kompany ducked at the last min?

Great example.
birchvillablue said:
Peter Schmeichel via BBC, rag or fuckwit?
<a class="postlink" href="http://www.bbc.co.uk/sport/0/football/24875994" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;">http://www.bbc.co.uk/sport/0/football/24875994</a>
He's showing him more loyalty than many self titled "blues" on here.

That's not a dig at those who are criticizing his mistakes, but one at those taking the piss.
 
From someone who's forgot more about goalkeeping than anyone on here knows;

But Schmeichel, who played for both Manchester clubs, told BBC 5 live: "I don't think he's done too much wrong.
"Sometimes things aren't working for you, but when it's Joe Hart it's highlighted like he's killed someone."
"I disagree with Pellegrini's decision. I disagree with the whole debate about Joe Hart," he added.
"He might have had the odd situation, but he hasn't gone from being an absolutely brilliant keeper to what he is being portrayed as now.
Continue reading the main story

The problem Joe has now is that if Pantilimon doesn't make a mistake, Pellegrini is not going to be able to drop him


"Why is it that when you finally have an English goalkeeper who has the quality to become the first part of the spine that can actually take England somewhere, everyone wants to drag this kid down?
"You have a unique goalkeeper here, someone who is very, very good even on his bad days.
"When you look at the goals he has been criticised for, at some point they could have been prevented by a defender or it was a misunderstanding.
"It is not down to Joe Hart on his own. Manchester City have got problems at the back."
 
birchvillablue said:
Peter Schmeichel via BBC, rag or fuckwit?
<a class="postlink" href="http://www.bbc.co.uk/sport/0/football/24875994" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;">http://www.bbc.co.uk/sport/0/football/24875994</a>
Schmeichel is being completely consistent with what I've heard him say before on keepers who are out of form or having a tricky patch, fair play to him. He has a view, a view informed by his vast goalkeeping experience, and he's applying it consistently.
 
Goalkeepers tend to stick up for each other.

Hart will definitely get a run in December no matter how well Costel plays. City will want to see if he's recovered form before the transfer window opens.

I think Costel will get the Sunderland, Spurs and Swansea games with Hart playing against Plzen and Bayern (if its a dead rubber). After that it will depend on how each play, but Hart will get a run
 
A sad state of affairs when a bloke who doesn't particularly like joe is showing more support and loyalty to him than most so called blues on here
 
forevermancity said:
A sad state of affairs when a bloke who doesn't particularly like joe is showing more support and loyalty to him than most so called blues on here
I don't think most blues are showing a lack of loyalty or support - of course you'll always get a few with extreme opinions one way or another but I'd have thought the majority of us want Joe to come back and get back to the form we know he's capable of.
Dropping him was a tough call, it was done for valid reasons though. Now it's up to Joe to prove he's got the mentality to come back stronger.
I think he will, and this last few months will just be a small footnote in a long successful career.
 
Pablo1 said:
forevermancity said:
A sad state of affairs when a bloke who doesn't particularly like joe is showing more support and loyalty to him than most so called blues on here
I don't think most blues are showing a lack of loyalty or support - of course you'll always get a few with extreme opinions one way or another but I'd have thought the majority of us want Joe to come back and get back to the form we know he's capable of.
Dropping him was a tough call, it was done for valid reasons though. Now it's up to Joe to prove he's got the mentality to come back stronger.
I think he will, and this last few months will just be a small footnote in a long successful career.
It's pretty pathetic pal, but it's got some pretty spiteful shit in here.
 
forevermancity said:
A sad state of affairs when a bloke who doesn't particularly like joe is showing more support and loyalty to him than most so called blues on here


And where is the loyalty for Pantillimon isn't he a City player as well?
he has never let the club down and was treated appallingly in the FA cup Final which was another Game where Hart played and never covered himself in glory

I don't care who comes out and defends Hart imho most of them are looking towards England
I only care about City and I for one think Hart deserved dropping not just for his mistakes but also for his terrible distribution, which hasn't got any better in the last two years, and also for the fact that he has terrible command of his area in general and the fact he gets beaten at his far post way too often

Hart has massive flaws in his game and he is only viewed as the best in England because this is the worst era for English keepers in fifty years Hart would be now where near the England set up in any other generation of English keepers

People should be getting behind Pantillimon and let Hart worry how or in fact if he ever gets back into the first team
 
Bluemoon115 said:
Pablo1 said:
forevermancity said:
A sad state of affairs when a bloke who doesn't particularly like joe is showing more support and loyalty to him than most so called blues on here
I don't think most blues are showing a lack of loyalty or support - of course you'll always get a few with extreme opinions one way or another but I'd have thought the majority of us want Joe to come back and get back to the form we know he's capable of.
Dropping him was a tough call, it was done for valid reasons though. Now it's up to Joe to prove he's got the mentality to come back stronger.
I think he will, and this last few months will just be a small footnote in a long successful career.
It's pretty pathetic pal, but it's got some pretty spiteful shit in here.
No doubt about it. There are a couple of posters who don't like Hart on a personnel level and like all threads, the dissenters seem to be loudest, most repetitive, etc.
 
birchvillablue said:
Peter Schmeichel via BBC, rag or fuckwit?
<a class="postlink" href="http://www.bbc.co.uk/sport/0/football/24875994" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;">http://www.bbc.co.uk/sport/0/football/24875994</a>

Both and you can add bitter to that too, ever since we let go of Schmeichel junior. Dropping Joe for a few games to take the heat off him is no bad thing. Trouble is the rag media, including this prick like to keep it on. End of.
 
Scully said:
birchvillablue said:
Peter Schmeichel via BBC, rag or fuckwit?
<a class="postlink" href="http://www.bbc.co.uk/sport/0/football/24875994" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;">http://www.bbc.co.uk/sport/0/football/24875994</a>

Both and you can add bitter to that too, ever since we let go of Schmeichel junior. Dropping Joe for a few games to take the heat off him is no bad thing. Trouble is the rag media, including this prick like to keep it on. End of.

Nothing much wrong with what he is saying, if anything he's saying Hart gets too much criticism for mistakes he makes!
Don't agree with him saying Hart shouldn't have been dropped though as it sets a high example of what we expect from players no matter what position they play in!
 
Not surprised the Hart Groupies won't support Pants - who deserves our full backing.

Joe will have opportunities with England and in the Cup at Leicester to show he is back to form and to compete for the number 1 slot. Hopefully Joe will Come back to his best.

There are tougher breaks such Joelon not getting a sniff of a game despite being a good player.
 
Tim of the Oak said:
Not surprised the Hart Groupies won't support Pants - who deserves our full backing.

Joe will have opportunities with England and in the Cup at Leicester to show he is back to form and to compete for the number 1 slot. Hopefully Joe will Come back to his best.

There are tougher breaks such Joelon not getting a sniff of a game despite being a good player.
Not really he cant play a high line as he doesn't have the pace or the positional awareness needed despite being a good defender they are his weaknesses. Just like Pants and his have a flap at a corner every game
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Don't have an account? Register now and see fewer ads!

SIGN UP
Back
Top