CityPar
Well-Known Member
Re: John Carew
Never mind which are available - if any were would they even want to come to City?! Money isn't enough for the top guys. Prizes are the name of the game and we're so far away from that right now that best we can get imo is the Carew type. It's the next step but not a long term one fortunately.
mcs said:PlattLaneBoy said:Ye mcs EXACTLY look at all the city players this season. AND LOOK WERE WE'RE GOIN TO FINISH 10TH SO ALL THEM GOALS THIS SEASON WERENT ENUFF SO TO COMPARE JOHN CAREW TO THEM AND SAY IT MAKES HIM LOOK GOOD IS WRONG BECAUSE WE DID NOTHING THIS SEASON
Do you mind not typing in capitals? I am only trying to have an intelligent debate, and you are just dragging it down.
If we can't compare strikers on their return in terms of goals, then what should we compare them on?
What I was trying to show is that clearly Carew is an improvement on what we have at the club, and as we not only need to look to build a top quality first XI, but a good quality squad overall, then I think Carew would not be a bad purchase.
You haven't yet answered my question from earlier about which 30+ season strikers are available? I am waiting with baited breath for your response.
Never mind which are available - if any were would they even want to come to City?! Money isn't enough for the top guys. Prizes are the name of the game and we're so far away from that right now that best we can get imo is the Carew type. It's the next step but not a long term one fortunately.