Dyed Petya
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 2 May 2007
- Messages
- 1,490
fulhamroad22 said:Totally agree but do we know for sure it was some kind of Chelsea briefing? How do we know that?
I also think it'll be a bit silly for Chelsea to have made up all these statements. They'll look like right idiots should Terry leave.
It was my assumption at the time, but I don't think it's an unreasonable assumption, just based on the way the stories were written. They talked about what Chelsea expected, which would usually mean it's come from the club, and echoed comments from the manager and various players this week.
I know that on its own this doesn't mean much, but one of the ITKs on here also suggested that Chelsea's communications guy (Simon Greenberg? - sorry, don't have time to check the name) had held an off-the-record press briefing in LA. And the stories were written, generally, by reporters who are covering the tour, weren't they? One or two of them did make references to Chelsea sources, I think. This is my recollection of it, anyway, but, again, I don't have time to go and check. If correct, then it does really point towards Chelsea.
If it did come from Chelsea, then I think there are two reasons it's because they are clearly making it as difficult as possible for Terry if he does want to go, and this fits with that strategy. If he does go, it will allow them to characterise him as a money-grabbing liar, and he'll know that. I don't think the club will look stupid - they'll offload all the blame onto the player, and he'll face an absolute storm of abuse in the press.
My hunch is that he'll stay, for that reason. I'd have thought the saga may well damage his standing among Chelsea fans, however, although you'll be able to judge that better than me.