You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
John Terry [Merged]
- Thread starter CooperMcfcF/W
- Start date
- Status
- Not open for further replies.
avoidconfusion
Well-Known Member
Re: Chelsea reject Terry offer [Merged]
I am saying that neither Hughes nor Cook would tap up a player contracted to another club and I am saying that your story from your mate is bullshit.
So you are saying Hughes was not in Dubai last week staying in villa near John Terrys ?
I am saying that neither Hughes nor Cook would tap up a player contracted to another club and I am saying that your story from your mate is bullshit.
Re: Chelsea reject Terry offer [Merged]
Hi Guys, Chelsea fan in peace (unlike the other muppet) just wanted to clear up this myth about this huge debt you seem to think we seem to
Fair play mate. I think the point was you were midtable - 6th at best up till 2003 and you average attendances even after all your success and investment over the last few years has not been great. Yes your stadium is not so good but surely with all the money you had if you thought you could fill a bigger ground one would hav been built ala Arsenal with the emirates.
The truth is before Roman Chelsea were just an average mid table side in every sense certainly no bigger than city.
Hi Guys, Chelsea fan in peace (unlike the other muppet) just wanted to clear up this myth about this huge debt you seem to think we seem to
have.
It is nowhere near the figure some of you estimate, you may not know that earlier this year Abramovich turned half of the debt owed in equity. There is still a debt but his commitment to the club is the same as ever. The notion that we would not survive without him is simply not true.
Also i think some of you are slightly unfair towards Chelseas history of crowds and success (did i read we were the 4th biggest team in London ? 3rd, but not 4th!) We have always had a big support base and i believe we have the 5th biggest crowd aggregate in English football history.
Its a shame some of you have taken the 'chelsea never won a football match before 2003 innit' attitude Gooners and Scousers seem to because I think there has always been a bit of affinity between City and Chelsea fans - even more so these days are we are the one set of fans who can really relate to what you are going though now and i think you will find most Chelsea fans wish you all the luck in the world. Its a fun ride for sure, lets hope you dont make some of the mistakes we have. All the best of luck lads. I reckon you could sneak 4th place this year.
As for JT ? I dont thnk he will go, but who knows. Id take 300k a week, and so would you i suspect!!
Fair play mate. I think the point was you were midtable - 6th at best up till 2003 and you average attendances even after all your success and investment over the last few years has not been great. Yes your stadium is not so good but surely with all the money you had if you thought you could fill a bigger ground one would hav been built ala Arsenal with the emirates.
The truth is before Roman Chelsea were just an average mid table side in every sense certainly no bigger than city.
Citytillidie69
Well-Known Member
Re: Chelsea reject Terry offer [Merged]
or maybe they just wouldn't admit it ....unlike Chelsea who had to come clean after photo's were published of C'ashley affair.
avoidconfusion said:So you are saying Hughes was not in Dubai last week staying in villa near John Terrys ?
I am saying that neither Hughes nor Cook would tap up a player contracted to another club and I am saying that your story from your mate is bullshit.
or maybe they just wouldn't admit it ....unlike Chelsea who had to come clean after photo's were published of C'ashley affair.
Re: Chelsea reject Terry offer [Merged]
Well you dont know that do you though ? Thats your OPINION
.
You dont know Cook. You dont know Hughes. You dont know me or my friend.
So you are talking complete shit really mate !
I am saying that neither Hughes nor Cook would tap up a player contracted to another club and I am saying that your story from your mate is bullshit.
Well you dont know that do you though ? Thats your OPINION
.
You dont know Cook. You dont know Hughes. You dont know me or my friend.
So you are talking complete shit really mate !
Barry Conlons wig
Well-Known Member
Re: Chelsea reject Terry offer [Merged]
funny funny funny just spat all over my screen when i read that pmsl
Nixon_The_Bike_Thief said:Citytillidie69 said:When was hughes over in Dubai, because lescott was over there a couple of weeks ago as well sunning his ass.
At this rate Hughes will have been out there so long it will be like having David Dickenson managing us next season
funny funny funny just spat all over my screen when i read that pmsl
avoidconfusion
Well-Known Member
Re: Chelsea reject Terry offer [Merged]
Oh yea sure, and if those meetings really happened, of course noone took a picture of Cook and JT or Hughes and JT having a little chit chat right? Bullshit.
Citytillidie69 said:avoidconfusion said:So you are saying Hughes was not in Dubai last week staying in villa near John Terrys ?
I am saying that neither Hughes nor Cook would tap up a player contracted to another club and I am saying that your story from your mate is bullshit.
or maybe they just wouldn't admit it ....unlike Chelsea who had to come clean after photo's were published of C'ashley affair.
Oh yea sure, and if those meetings really happened, of course noone took a picture of Cook and JT or Hughes and JT having a little chit chat right? Bullshit.
avoidconfusion
Well-Known Member
Re: Chelsea reject Terry offer [Merged]
What?
2003-2004 2nd -----Abramovich arrives
2002-2003 4th
2001-2002 6th
2000-2001 6th
1999-2000 5th
1998-1999 3rd
1997-1998 4th
1996-1997 6th
I wouldn't call that average or midtable.
alera said:Fair play mate. I think the point was you were midtable - 6th at best up till 2003 and you average attendances even after all your success and investmane over the last few years has not been great. Yes your stadium is not so good but surely with all the money you had if you thought you could fill a bigger ground one would hav been built ala Arsenal with the emirates.
The truth is before Roman Chelsea were just an average mid table side in every sense certainly no bigger than city.
What?
2003-2004 2nd -----Abramovich arrives
2002-2003 4th
2001-2002 6th
2000-2001 6th
1999-2000 5th
1998-1999 3rd
1997-1998 4th
1996-1997 6th
I wouldn't call that average or midtable.
avoidconfusion
Well-Known Member
Re: Chelsea reject Terry offer [Merged]
I think you're the one talking complete shit really.... bullshit to be more precise.
alera said:.
You dont know Cook. You dont know Hughes. You dont know me or my friend.
So you are talking complete shit really mate !
I think you're the one talking complete shit really.... bullshit to be more precise.
Re: Chelsea reject Terry offer [Merged]
mate, do you seriously believe this sort of thing does not happen at top football clubs ?
avoidconfusion said:So you are saying Hughes was not in Dubai last week staying in villa near John Terrys ?
I am saying that neither Hughes nor Cook would tap up a player contracted to another club and I am saying that your story from your mate is bullshit.
mate, do you seriously believe this sort of thing does not happen at top football clubs ?
Johnny Tabasco
Active Member
- Joined
- 3 Jun 2009
- Messages
- 32
Re: Chelsea reject Terry offer [Merged]
Chelsea had finished in the top 6 and qualifed for Europe for the seven seasons before Roman came. Our attendances are fine. Apart from one of two Champions League minnow matches a few years ago we sell out every game at SB.
Not getting into arguments about this though. Didnt come here to do that.
alera said:Fair play mate. I think the point was you were midtable - 6th at best up till 2003 and you average attendances even after all your success and investmane over the last few years has not been great. Yes your stadium is not so good but surely with all the money you had if you thought you could fill a bigger ground one would hav been built ala Arsenal with the emirates.
The truth is before Roman Chelsea were just an average mid table side in every sense certainly no bigger than city.
Chelsea had finished in the top 6 and qualifed for Europe for the seven seasons before Roman came. Our attendances are fine. Apart from one of two Champions League minnow matches a few years ago we sell out every game at SB.
Not getting into arguments about this though. Didnt come here to do that.
Re: Chelsea reject Terry offer [Merged]
In your opinion ! Maybe there are pictures and they will come out in the comming weeks ! Who can say. Who cares really....
Oh yea sure, and if those meetings really happened, of course noone took a picture of Cook and JT or Hughes and JT having a little chit chat right? Bullshit.
In your opinion ! Maybe there are pictures and they will come out in the comming weeks ! Who can say. Who cares really....
Re: Chelsea reject Terry offer [Merged]
well thats about the same level as Everton, fulham are at now. the worlds not hailing them as huge clubs are they now.
avoidconfusion said:alera said:Fair play mate. I think the point was you were midtable - 6th at best up till 2003 and you average attendances even after all your success and investmane over the last few years has not been great. Yes your stadium is not so good but surely with all the money you had if you thought you could fill a bigger ground one would hav been built ala Arsenal with the emirates.
The truth is before Roman Chelsea were just an average mid table side in every sense certainly no bigger than city.
What?
2003-2004 2nd -----Abramovich arrives
2002-2003 4th
2001-2002 6th
2000-2001 6th
1999-2000 5th
1998-1999 3rd
1997-1998 4th
1996-1997 6th
I wouldn't call that average or midtable.
well thats about the same level as Everton, fulham are at now. the worlds not hailing them as huge clubs are they now.
Re: Chelsea reject Terry offer [Merged]
Even Celtic and Rangers in the joke SPL pub league are much much better supported.
Your attendance are not fine compared to the big UK and european sides !Chelsea had finished in the top 6 and qualifed for Europe for the seven seasons before Roman came. Our attendances are fine. Apart from one of two Champions League minnow matches a few years ago we sell out every game at SB.
Not getting into arguments about this though. Didnt come here to do that.
Even Celtic and Rangers in the joke SPL pub league are much much better supported.
Re: Chelsea reject Terry offer [Merged]
You might care if MC get points deducted next season?
alera said:Oh yea sure, and if those meetings really happened, of course noone took a picture of Cook and JT or Hughes and JT having a little chit chat right? Bullshit.
In your opinion ! Maybe there are pictures and they will come out in the comming weeks ! Who can say. Who cares really....
You might care if MC get points deducted next season?
avoidconfusion
Well-Known Member
Re: Chelsea reject Terry offer [Merged]
Fulham finished 7th for the first time in how many years?
Did Everton finish in the top 6 consistently, even as high as 3rd, for 7 years in a row?
I am not saying Chelsea were football giants or a huge club then but they were not average or midtable very very obviously.
sniff said:avoidconfusion said:alera said:Fair play mate. I think the point was you were midtable - 6th at best up till 2003 and you average attendances even after all your success and investmane over the last few years has not been great. Yes your stadium is not so good but surely with all the money you had if you thought you could fill a bigger ground one would hav been built ala Arsenal with the emirates.
The truth is before Roman Chelsea were just an average mid table side in every sense certainly no bigger than city.
What?
2003-2004 2nd -----Abramovich arrives
2002-2003 4th
2001-2002 6th
2000-2001 6th
1999-2000 5th
1998-1999 3rd
1997-1998 4th
1996-1997 6th
I wouldn't call that average or midtable.
well thats about the same level as Everton, fulham are at now. the worlds not hailing them as huge clubs are they now.
Fulham finished 7th for the first time in how many years?
Did Everton finish in the top 6 consistently, even as high as 3rd, for 7 years in a row?
I am not saying Chelsea were football giants or a huge club then but they were not average or midtable very very obviously.
dannybcity
Well-Known Member
Re: Chelsea reject Terry offer [Merged]
Unfortunately for you mate, even if you wanted a sensible discussion, which I might add is always welcome on here, your chance has been ruined by the fact we had some little Chelsea tosser on here 5 minutes ago who has now left. You'll be left to take his flack, but don't let that put you off.
Johnny Tabasco said:Chelsea had finished in the top 6 and qualifed for Europe for the seven seasons before Roman came. Our attendances are fine. Apart from one of two Champions League minnow matches a few years ago we sell out every game at SB.
Not getting into arguments about this though. Didnt come here to do that.
Unfortunately for you mate, even if you wanted a sensible discussion, which I might add is always welcome on here, your chance has been ruined by the fact we had some little Chelsea tosser on here 5 minutes ago who has now left. You'll be left to take his flack, but don't let that put you off.
Re: Chelsea reject Terry offer [Merged]
Didnt happen to Chelsea so why would it happen to us ?
You might care if MC get points deducted next season?
Didnt happen to Chelsea so why would it happen to us ?
avoidconfusion
Well-Known Member
Re: Chelsea reject Terry offer [Merged]
That's not what I am saying at all. What I am saying is, if Cook or Hughes would so something like that, they would not do it in broad daylight, at public places where everyone can see them.
vincent said:avoidconfusion said:So you are saying Hughes was not in Dubai last week staying in villa near John Terrys ?
I am saying that neither Hughes nor Cook would tap up a player contracted to another club and I am saying that your story from your mate is bullshit.
mate, do you seriously believe this sort of thing does not happen at top football clubs ?
That's not what I am saying at all. What I am saying is, if Cook or Hughes would so something like that, they would not do it in broad daylight, at public places where everyone can see them.
BibbyBlue85
Well-Known Member
Re: Chelsea reject Terry offer [Merged]
To be fair avoidconfusion someone on bluemoon reported this around 2 weeks ago that Hughes and Terry were seen together at the hotel and the story broke in the press this morning. I am a little scepticle about the restaurant story but there is no need to jump all over alera like that. If you don't believe the information he has wrote just take it with a pinch of salt mate. We are all blues who want the best for our club so if little bits of info come out here and there lets just take them at face value and not slag each other off mate. We all have one thing in common on her and that is OUR LOVE FOR CITY!
Not ranting just putting my point across
To be fair avoidconfusion someone on bluemoon reported this around 2 weeks ago that Hughes and Terry were seen together at the hotel and the story broke in the press this morning. I am a little scepticle about the restaurant story but there is no need to jump all over alera like that. If you don't believe the information he has wrote just take it with a pinch of salt mate. We are all blues who want the best for our club so if little bits of info come out here and there lets just take them at face value and not slag each other off mate. We all have one thing in common on her and that is OUR LOVE FOR CITY!
Not ranting just putting my point across
- Status
- Not open for further replies.