John Terry [Merged]

Status
Not open for further replies.
Re: Why Terry? Do we have a realistic transfer strategy?

What happens if JT puts in a transfer request, cant chelsea just ignore it. The last word must be the clubs right?
 
Re: Chelsea reject Terry offer [Merged]

Paulmcfc2703 said:
lionheart said:
BLUEMOONBAZ said:
Well terrys back to pre season training thu, so if were gonna hit them with another bid it should be today/tonight imho.Then he will either blow us out or ask to see whats avail...
go little city haha
We should forget Terry and sign Lucio for 6million...he's the captain and centre-half of some crappy footballing nation called Brazil in case anybody was unaware.


lets get both :)

well as i said he,s back tommorow so hopefully the shit will hit the fan .And we can put this to bed..
any news bill ?
 
Re: Why Terry? Do we have a realistic transfer strategy?

RobinJo said:
Can you tell me why this couldn't have gone in the other fucking threads.

What is it with you guys. What do you want a board with 1 bloody thread on it and 90,000,000 pages?????!

There's absolutely NOTHING wrong with this as a new thread imo.
 
Re: Why Terry? Do we have a realistic transfer strategy?

Chippy_boy said:
RobinJo said:
Can you tell me why this couldn't have gone in the other fucking threads.

What is it with you guys. What do you want a board with 1 bloody thread on it and 90,000,000 pages?????!

There's absolutely NOTHING wrong with this as a new thread imo.


It clogs up the board and make it hard to find threads that might have some interesting info in them, as to why mods are forever merging topics.
 
Re: Why Terry? Do we have a realistic transfer strategy?

you think 1 thread with 2000 posts and 100+ pages make sit easier to find stuff?

why don't they just have 1 really big book at the library? be easy to find like.
 
Re: Why Terry? Do we have a realistic transfer strategy?

He's the England captain, he's a quality CB, the owner by all accounts really rates him and would love to see England lift the world cup next year with him being a member of our club.

Granted it seems a hell of a lot of money but this guys hardly worried about that and it's all relative anyway, if Tranaldois worth £80 million..

I'm not really bothered either way as long as we sign one or two more quality defenders and likewise 1 or 2 strikers.
 
Re: Why Terry? Do we have a realistic transfer strategy?

SingBlue said:
you think 1 thread with 2000 posts and 100+ pages make sit easier to find stuff?

why don't they just have 1 really big book at the library? be easy to find like.


No if you want to look at stuff about Terry, then go into the Terry thread. Or how about we just have the whole forum as one big one, without seperate forums.
 
Re: Chelsea reject Terry offer [Merged]

Did anybody catch what the Chelsea chairman said on Chelsea TV? It was on SSN earlier but couldnt get to watch it properly

Impression I got was Terry is staying. Although he said he would be gutted if he went..
 
Re: Why Terry? Do we have a realistic transfer strategy?

RobinJo said:
SingBlue said:
you think 1 thread with 2000 posts and 100+ pages make sit easier to find stuff?

why don't they just have 1 really big book at the library? be easy to find like.


No if you want to look at stuff about Terry, then go into the Terry thread. Or how about we just have the whole forum as one big one, without seperate forums.

But this wasn't about Terry specifically. It was a question about whether we have a sensible transfer strategy. Filed conveniently under "Do we have a realistic transfer strategy?"

I think it would have been complete OT to put it in a "Is John Terry signing" thread.
 
Re: Chelsea reject Terry offer [Merged]

MonsallBlue said:
Did anybody catch what the Chelsea chairman said on Chelsea TV? It was on SSN earlier but couldnt get to watch it properly

Impression I got was Terry is staying. Although he said he would be gutted if he went..

he sed hed be gutted as a chelsea fan but as a chairman hes guaranteeing he wont leave!!
 
Re: Chelsea reject Terry offer [Merged]

larderland said:
MonsallBlue said:
Did anybody catch what the Chelsea chairman said on Chelsea TV? It was on SSN earlier but couldnt get to watch it properly

Impression I got was Terry is staying. Although he said he would be gutted if he went..

he sed hed be gutted as a chelsea fan but as a chairman hes guaranteeing he wont leave!!

Hmm, what an odd statement.
 
Re: Is anyone that arsed if John Terry doesn't sign?

Pam said:
danburge82 said:
but it would be a poor move for Terry

So what is your thinking on why Terry won't confirm where his future lies even after his present club are publicly on record as requesting him to do so?

I know this is a late reply on this but the answer to your question is: £££££££££££££££££££££££££££££££££££££££££££££££££££££££££££££
 
Re: Is anyone that arsed if John Terry doesn't sign?

pinkwheeltrim said:
IF that prick signs for us,it could very well be the last staw for me!! I am seriously thinking about walking away from the team I have loved for many years,things just don't feel right anymore!!!



I know I will get a load of stick from our new breed of dickhead fans for even saying this!!

I wont give you stick, well maybe i will, id still be a loyal blue if we signed Gary Neville.............well, maybe not! haha! But whats so wrong with Terry that you'd walk away from City!?

Chelsea and England captain, and an excellent captain and leader of both!
He went into the Barca dressing room after that Chapms Lg semi final and apologised and consoled them on what had happened - Barca players applauded him!

So what if he was a United fan as a kid, so was Stephen Ireland! so what if he and his family have a bit of a track history of being in trouble and a bit naughty, i could tell you some things that ive got up to in my life and some of you would faint!

so what is is thats so bad about him!?

(I by the way also think its a bad move but only for Terry, for City it is nothing but positive![apart from it will be the moment we will be the most hated club in Britain and will kick off the start of City fans becoming like the Rags we hate!]!)
 
Re: Terry - it looks on?

alera said:
He wants pay parity with the top earners and a 5 year deal. Obvious what will happen they will cave in as with Lampard and he will get what he wants....

Lampard and Ballack have it in the their contracts that they will be the top paid players though as well so any bumps in salary for Terry will cost them for those players as well.

Loose loose situation for Chelsea this...

I think this works in our favour. If Terry goes back to Chelski and says "City are going to buy Tevez, Eto'o etc and offer me 200k a week-match it or I'm off" then Chelsea will not pay him because Lampard, Ballack and Drogba will throw their toys out of the pram. I don't think we've heard the last of this one, could run right through to deadline day.
 
Re: Terry - it looks on?

city diehard said:
has anybody got the thread that spursmad started about a transfer request for terry?

that was all that was said he popped on left 1 post then got back to work ......... the rest of the thread had no more info
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Don't have an account? Register now and see fewer ads!

SIGN UP
Back
Top