Join me Hughes outers?

BillyShears said:
Jesus, even I'm not say here saying Hughes is a brilliant manager.

But if you go back and look at the point of this thread, and then look at the contributions of Moomba and few others, you can clearly see that they have no intention of doing anything other than continuing to woman and moan about Hughes all summer long. And at the same time continue to woman and moan about their right to woman and moan...

It's called discussion Billy, you could try it some time.
 
moomba said:
BillyShears said:
Jesus, even I'm not say here saying Hughes is a brilliant manager.

But if you go back and look at the point of this thread, and then look at the contributions of Moomba and few others, you can clearly see that they have no intention of doing anything other than continuing to woman and moan about Hughes all summer long. And at the same time continue to woman and moan about their right to woman and moan...

It's called discussion Billy, you could try it some time.

Really Moomba? I haven't seen you discuss anything in this thread other than your right to woman and moan...

Strange kind of discussion, but whatever keep you occupied...

EDIT:

I refer you once again to the irony in your comment regarding Stuart Pearce and John Wardle...
 
You still haven't answered the question Billy.

If Wardle didn't sack Pearce, would you have just accepted it and refused to criticise him?

And if there was discussion on whether you had the right on a public message board to air your criticisms of the manager would you just accept that you should STFU?
 
Bonol said:
For me tho, our owners are sticking by their original word, which while admirable, is mis-guided in that it has to be based on hope rather than any tangible evidence to show he will turn it around.
I take the opposite view. I think keeping MH is a smart move. When MH took the job at City the job title was, we have very little money, save our bacon MH. Then the fairy godfathers arrived and the job description became, here's all the money you could ever dream of, go turn us into one of the best teams in the world MH. The only problem was the arrival of our owners coincided with the closing of the first transfer window when Robinho arrives in the last minutes. MH had little time to devise a strategy at this time.
The season was then always going to be a strange season. The first half of the season MH was effectively evaluating Sven old squad. MH then had the mid season transfer window to improve the squad and stave of relegation, i think the reason MH never aquired more players at this time was the quality was just not available and he was not going to panic buy.
The second half of the season could of been better but with the high expectations and some unhelpful and unprofessional behavour from players with the experience to no better, i think we did ok. With the owners giving MH full authority and backing the manager next year, MH can now get rid of the bad apples and bring in some quality players. The summer holds great promise for us City fans and we really should back the manager and enjoy the ride. Those who are calling for MH head under these circumstances need to book an appointment with the doctor for depression.


well said Bonol !
 
moomba said:
You still haven't answered the question Billy.

If Wardle didn't sack Pearce, would you have just accepted it and refused to criticise him?

And if there was discussion on whether you had the right on a public message board to air your criticisms of the manager would you just accept that you should STFU?

Moomba, there you go again bitching and moaning about your right to woman and moan...

Its fucking dull, and I reserve the right to say as much when I feel it...

Now tell me...did you rip up your season ticket when we signed Bellamy?
 
tommyducks said:
Moomba.

I dislike Mark Hughes.

I don't rate him and don't think he has done anything to merit being given another season.

My views have not changed.

I have just decided that, as I can't make a change, I either hope we do well under him or I don't.

I reserve the right to react to results next season, but for now I hope MH can buy the players to help us improve next term. And right now I see no point in slagging him off any more. MH success = MCFC success, which is what we all want.

Agree 100%.
If we're stuck with him,then so be it.
But we should still be able to question his tactics/buys/decision-making without undermining his authority or coming to cyber-blows with other posters.
Blind faith in any manager is dangerous,and I would hope that Hughes,or indeed the players themselves,should not be beyond criticism,as long as it is valid and constructive.
 
moomba said:
If I don't think the manager is the right man for the job why would I change my opinion just because the board thinks differently.

I certainly wouldn't expect you, or anyone else for that matter, to change their opinion based on today's events. However, is there really any need to continually state that same opinion?

I think most people's views on the subject are already known by now and having countless threads on the same subject, saying the same things, just seems rather pointless.
 
tommyducks said:
I have just decided that, as I can't make a change, I either hope we do well under him or I don't.

I certainly hope we do well under him, as (I suspect) do most of the people that want him out.

And right now I see no point in slagging him off any more. MH success = MCFC success, which is what we all want.

If I thought I was inhibiting the success of the club in any way I would keep quiet. But in reality what I post on here has absolutely no impact, so I'll keep doing it. Much better venting on here than kicking the cat at home.
 
nijinsky's fetlocks said:
tommyducks said:
Moomba.

I dislike Mark Hughes.

I don't rate him and don't think he has done anything to merit being given another season.

My views have not changed.

I have just decided that, as I can't make a change, I either hope we do well under him or I don't.

I reserve the right to react to results next season, but for now I hope MH can buy the players to help us improve next term. And right now I see no point in slagging him off any more. MH success = MCFC success, which is what we all want.

Agree 100%.
If we're stuck with him,then so be it.
But we should still be able to question his tactics/buys/decision-making without undermining his authority or coming to cyber-blows with other posters.
Blind faith in any manager is dangerous,and I would hope that Hughes,or indeed the players themselves,should not be beyond criticism,as long as it is valid and constructive.

Wise words.
 
PhuketBlue said:
I certainly wouldn't expect you, or anyone else for that matter, to change their opinion based on today's events. However, is there really any need to continually state that same opinion?

Yes, it the discussion merits it.

I don't tend to start threads, just join in with discussions on a range of topics. And people are obviously interested in discussing the manager, otherwise the threads on him would all die a natural death.
 

Don't have an account? Register now and see fewer ads!

SIGN UP
Back
Top
  AdBlock Detected
Bluemoon relies on advertising to pay our hosting fees. Please support the site by disabling your ad blocking software to help keep the forum sustainable. Thanks.