Bravo. ;-)
You're right.
The lad signed a new contract with Brum so they could sell him and bank the money. "Ravel 2.0" would have walked to the highest paying club in the prem and spunked it all on slags and drugs.
It is rare, you are right.Alexis Sanchez is arguably the only one, (star player at Arsenal before Rags).
But they only let go of him after buying Neymar and then Suarez.
You'd be better off trying to pick off players from Madrid.
Alexis Sanchez, Neymar, Zlatan Ibrahimovic, Samuel Eto'o, ThiagoYes. I thought you'd mention him. We bought a player who peaked after we bought him and didn't fit in their system within the first XI. Nowadays they have billion euro buyouts.
Apart from Yaya who has got better since leaving Barcelona after being a first team regular?
Alexis Sanchez, Neymar, Zlatan Ibrahimovic, Samuel Eto'o, Thiago
It is rare, you are right.
Figo and R9.
Cucurella?
All it takes is for them to have extra players in positions that they know they have starters for. Ie Busquets and Yaya.Well I was excluding that era and before otherwise you might as well include Luis Suarez the Spaniard.
Never played for the first team.
I think we already have one….Can we start working on a song for him now so it’s ready for when he signs?
Don’t want him ending up like poor Erling who will be lucky to have one before he waves us goodbye in 5 years for his new life in Madrid... :-)
Have to disagree. Ibrahimovic's career after Barcelona was far more impressive than his career before or during his time there. Neymar has improved IMO and has gotten absolutely outrageous numbers for PSG. He's not playing with peak Messi anymore so the Champions Leagues don't come so often.I've already mentioned Sanchez. Neymar and Ibrahimovic (arguably) didn't improve or decline,
Eto'o absolutely. His 2 years at Inter Milan was just about the man's peak. Maybe he was just the same level he was at Barca but he was hardly finished.Ibrahimovic was only there a year so such a decline would be extraordinary. Depends on how seriously you take Ligue 1.
Eto'o absolutely not and Thiago was not a first XI regular, he was backup.
Have to disagree. Ibrahimovic's career after Barcelona was far more impressive than his career before or during his time there. Neymar has improved IMO and has gotten absolutely outrageous numbers for PSG. He's not playing with peak Messi anymore so the Champions Leagues don't come so often.
Eto'o absolutely. His 2 years at Inter Milan was just about the man's peak. Maybe he was just the same level he was at Barca but he was hardly finished.
Thiago played 71 games in his last 2 years at Barcelona, he may have been rotated but he was not just a back up.
He'll still be 17 by the time people realise they're not in the general football thread and get back on topic.is he still only 17
It'll be £85m if that helps convince you, not £100m+I’m sure our scouting team know better than I. I merely can’t see what makes Bellingham worth £100m. Grealish neither, although he does have the ability to keep the ball better than most.
Maybe Bellingham is the answer. It just wouldn’t be for me at £100m+.
I would offer Barca £100m for Pedri if I was lent Tkixi’s special jumper for the day though.
Not hugely, it’s more likely to be £185m if the pound is worth half a euro next summer…It'll be £85m if that helps convince you, not £100m+
If it's 95 mill Euros, it could well be £100 mill plus by next summer :)It'll be £85m if that helps convince you, not £100m+
Not hugely, it’s more likely to be £185m if the pound is worth half a euro next summer…
Time will tell. There’s probably good reasons as to why neither of us are scouts or directors of football!
Fair do's, the exchange rate didn't occur to me but that's going to apply to most transfers for us at least I suppose.If it's 95 mill Euros, it could well be £100 mill plus by next summer :)
Clubs will probably have moved money to more stable currencies in all likelihood.Fair do's, the exchange rate didn't occur to me but that's going to apply to most transfers for us at least I suppose.