I don't have a little gang, people posting views similar to mine are posting their own views without any co-ordination or prior communication with me. At least I'm not part of a WhatsApp group if one exists.
She is concerned she won't get a fair trial because of the bad publicity generated by her own actions i.e. fleeing. Problematic isn't it? Although she probably didn't foresee the determination of Harry Dunn's family, I don't think many would have.
When asked why she had refused to return to the UK, Sacoolas' lawyer told the court: "Her fear is that with the tremendous media attention she will receive,
she’s concerned she will not receive fair treatment with the press and the local community. She is fearful upon her return and concerned and she’s certainly apologetic and accepts full responsibility for causing this accident."
This is one of your judges, not someone holding "a petty grudge".
The presiding judge
T. S. Ellis III replied: "
Accepting full responsibility doesn’t mean you run away, it means you stay there and face it. You shouldn’t overplay the full responsibility card."
Handing down his judgment, Ellis said: "While it is commendable that defendant Anne Sacoolas admits that she was negligent and that her negligence caused Harry Dunn’s death, this does not equate acceptance of responsibility. ...
Full acceptance of responsibility entails facing those harmed by her negligence and taking responsibility for her acts where they occurred, in the United Kingdom."[