Kamala Harris

Have Fox ever done traditional news? I thought they were the birthing ground of "Entertainment news".
That's MSNBC. A higher number of Fox news personalities are actually real news people. Unlike say MSNBC that's strictly Activists masquerading as news purveyors.


That includes, Bret Baire, the guy who's going to Interview the VP
 
That's MSNBC. A higher number of Fox news personalities are actually real news people. Unlike say MSNBC that's strictly Activists masquerading as news purveyors.


That includes, Bret Baire, the guy who's going to Interview the VP
I heard that today on the news from a Trump supporter in Georgia. Must be a ‘thing’.
 
That's MSNBC. A higher number of Fox news personalities are actually real news people. Unlike say MSNBC that's strictly Activists masquerading as news purveyors.


That includes, Bret Baire, the guy who's going to Interview the VP
And it shows in the wonderful quality of Fox; just hope they survive the next unfair and erroneous judgement for libelling the suppliers of voting machines as a major news story.
So far, their quality reporting on the voting scandals last time has cost them just short of a billion dollars.
Don’t forget, those machines were programmed in Venezuela by communists and operated via Jewish lasers, flipping votes from Trump to Biden.
 
Last edited:
And it shows in the wonderful quality of Fox; just hope they survive the next unfair and erroneous judgement for libelling the suppliers of voting machines as a major news story.
So far, their quality reporting on the voting scandals last time has cost them just short of a billion dollars.
Don’t forget, those machines were programmed in Venezuela by communists and operated via Jewish lasers, flipping votes from Trump to Biden.
Only if one were to least all the CNN/ MSNBC falsehoods. One would be here all day.
 
While we are at it, VP Harris has been accused credibly of plagiarizing portions of her book from Wikipedia of all ducking places.

Why am I not surprised.
 
While we are at it, VP Harris has been accused credibly of plagiarizing portions of her book from Wikipedia of all ducking places.

Why am I not susurprised.

Accused credibly.

What a sign of the times. Is that opposed to the times she's accused of something incredibly?
 
By all accounts, Harris performed extremely well during the Fox interview conducted by Bret Baier (I've seen snippets of the interview on Youtube). I'll have to see if I can watch the full interview on Youtube TV.
 
Kudos to her for going into the 'lions den' of fox and trying to bridge the huge divide in American politics. I don't think she came out of it well though and it was probably not worth the risk.
I think it countered a lot of the (unwarranted imo) negative criticism of her, and while I haven't seen the whole thing she came across pretty well from what I saw.

Not sure if it will transfer to votes but definitely worth doing it imo.
 
Kudos to her for going into the 'lions den' of fox and trying to bridge the huge divide in American politics. I don't think she came out of it well though and it was probably not worth the risk.
She showed strength going on Fox. Trump would never go on MSNBC. She was never going to lose any voters from their audience, and unless she went completely wibble, she was never going to lose votes overall. It's more likely she swayed wavering Republican voters after that. I'd say that was s risk worth taking.
 
That's MSNBC. A higher number of Fox news personalities are actually real news people. Unlike say MSNBC that's strictly Activists masquerading as news purveyors.


That includes, Bret Baire, the guy who's going to Interview the VP
They are both the same imo. Just opposite sides of the political spectrum.
 

Don't have an account? Register now and see fewer ads!

SIGN UP
Back
Top