Fox is going to have to change something once the judgement on the second voting machine case comes in.Maybe Fox is preparing for life without him and a return to normal old traditional news?
Ha ha ha sure.
Fox is going to have to change something once the judgement on the second voting machine case comes in.Maybe Fox is preparing for life without him and a return to normal old traditional news?
Ha ha ha sure.
Maybe Fox is preparing for life without him and a return to normal old traditional news?
Ha ha ha sure.
That's MSNBC. A higher number of Fox news personalities are actually real news people. Unlike say MSNBC that's strictly Activists masquerading as news purveyors.Have Fox ever done traditional news? I thought they were the birthing ground of "Entertainment news".
I heard that today on the news from a Trump supporter in Georgia. Must be a ‘thing’.That's MSNBC. A higher number of Fox news personalities are actually real news people. Unlike say MSNBC that's strictly Activists masquerading as news purveyors.
That includes, Bret Baire, the guy who's going to Interview the VP
And it shows in the wonderful quality of Fox; just hope they survive the next unfair and erroneous judgement for libelling the suppliers of voting machines as a major news story.That's MSNBC. A higher number of Fox news personalities are actually real news people. Unlike say MSNBC that's strictly Activists masquerading as news purveyors.
That includes, Bret Baire, the guy who's going to Interview the VP
Only if one were to least all the CNN/ MSNBC falsehoods. One would be here all day.And it shows in the wonderful quality of Fox; just hope they survive the next unfair and erroneous judgement for libelling the suppliers of voting machines as a major news story.
So far, their quality reporting on the voting scandals last time has cost them just short of a billion dollars.
Don’t forget, those machines were programmed in Venezuela by communists and operated via Jewish lasers, flipping votes from Trump to Biden.
While we are at it, VP Harris has been accused credibly of plagiarizing portions of her book from Wikipedia of all ducking places.
Why am I not susurprised.
Not afraid to call out their bullshit to their faces.
Kudos to her for going into the 'lions den' of fox and trying to bridge the huge divide in American politics. I don't think she came out of it well though and it was probably not worth the risk.![]()
Kamala Harris risked a lot for combative Fox News interview - it may not have paid off
Fox News is the political home of Republicans in the US, so Democratic presidential nominee Kamala Harris risked a lot taking on veteran interviewer Bret Baier.news.sky.com
Definitely risky and I think the idea of her going on Joe Rogan could do her more harm than goodKudos to her for going into the 'lions den' of fox and trying to bridge the huge divide in American politics. I don't think she came out of it well though and it was probably not worth the risk.
I did hear that. I think he's less likely to have a agenda at leastDefinitely risky and I think the idea of her going on Joe Rogan could do her more harm than good
Definitely risky and I think the idea of her going on Joe Rogan could do her more harm than good
I think it countered a lot of the (unwarranted imo) negative criticism of her, and while I haven't seen the whole thing she came across pretty well from what I saw.Kudos to her for going into the 'lions den' of fox and trying to bridge the huge divide in American politics. I don't think she came out of it well though and it was probably not worth the risk.
No way you’ve watched the whole thing.Kudos to her for going into the 'lions den' of fox and trying to bridge the huge divide in American politics. I don't think she came out of it well though and it was probably not worth the risk.
She showed strength going on Fox. Trump would never go on MSNBC. She was never going to lose any voters from their audience, and unless she went completely wibble, she was never going to lose votes overall. It's more likely she swayed wavering Republican voters after that. I'd say that was s risk worth taking.Kudos to her for going into the 'lions den' of fox and trying to bridge the huge divide in American politics. I don't think she came out of it well though and it was probably not worth the risk.
They are both the same imo. Just opposite sides of the political spectrum.That's MSNBC. A higher number of Fox news personalities are actually real news people. Unlike say MSNBC that's strictly Activists masquerading as news purveyors.
That includes, Bret Baire, the guy who's going to Interview the VP