Karim Rekik

Neville Kneville said:
Well I don't rate most of Nastasic's performances at all, including his first season, & thought he was absolutely dreadful v Rel Madrid, but irrespective of that, Nastasic has failed to hold down that spot, in spite of playing in the twice Champions team, next to Vincent Kompany. Nastasic is quicker & better in the air than Rekik, in spite of not being very good in either area.

I'm taking it Smalling was included as a joke.

I think you've pretty much proved my point. It rarely happens, if ever & imo would be unfair on Rekik & possibly finish him as a City prospect if it went wrong.

The only one I can think of is Micah Richards, & he was a much better athlete, exceptionally fast & great in the air (& basically a miles better defensive prospect than either Nastasic or Rekik).
wauw, no way im going into this, we are of completely different opinions!
 
Zin 'messiah' Zimmer said:
Neville Kneville said:
http://news.bbc.co.uk/sport1/hi/football/teams/m/man_city/6194424.stm

Manchester City manager Stuart Pearce says he will battle to keep hold of young England star Micah Richards despite reported interest from Chelsea.

The Stamford Bridge side have been linked with a £15m move for the versatile 18-year-old defender.

But Pearce told The Times: "I am not actively looking to sell Micah because he has a great future here.

"Whatever offers come in for him, it is going to take a ridiculously big offer to get him out of this football club."

The last player City sold to Chelsea was Shaun Wright-Phillips for £21m in July 2005 - but Pearce is adamant he no longer has to see his brightest talents leave.

"The offer they made us for Shaun had to be in that region to get him out of here, and the financial situation was such that we had to accept that offer," he added.

"Things have changed at the club since then. The Shaun money is in the bank and things are on an even keel.

"While we cannot go out and spend multi-millions on players, we have not got the bank knocking on the door.

"I would love to see Micah stay here, captain the club, and maybe be here for 10 years and carry the club on his back if he can.

"He is good enough to do it. I have not worked with anyone so good and so young."

Personally I thought your posts were improving from a tactical basis, however, not only did you just throw an article that rains praise from Stuart fucking pearce, you continue to beat the same drum re:nasty, don't be so ridiculous man, yes you're entitled to your opinion but for Christ sakes, you've just said don't change history to meet an agenda to someone earlier, you've just done the same. I'd certainly take mihajlović opinion on a player over Pearce any day of the week!!!

Hahaha, Derek Hatton talking football rating my tactical nous, like it, but don't care.

Just to mention, that this has nothing to do with tactics, we haven't even mentioned tactics, we are talking about how best to utilise young players & get the best from them. Why you have brought up tactics, I have no idea.

Anyway I will not & never have praised Stuart Pearce, I'm just proving the point of how Micah was rated. I am right & those denying it are telling porkies.

But in case you just jumped in without reading the rest of this thread, the recent theme is about players being thrown in, & the damage it can do, not about your mate Nastasic (who you went on record as saying is Bobby Moore meets Baresi ? I think that was it wasn't it ? Let's hope you are right eh ?). I was just using him as an example of a player who from all that promise, is now 2nd fiddle to a 33 year old Argentinian.. This is actually about Rekik & what's best for him though. I don't even rate him, but I think he deserves the best chance we can give him.

The example of Richards was one of the most highly rated kids in the country, whatever revisionist bollocks people come up with, & he was rated mainly as a central defender. He was one of the best we have ever had at youth level, perhaps the best. He excelled when first brought in, played loads of games then he lost form, as kids do. Suddenly he was a liability etc.

This kid was streets ahead as a defender,to anything we have now. Not at passing the ball etc, but as a defender. Different level. What if he'dnever been thrown in, & instead came back from somewhere like Holland, as a central defender, having learned his job ?

What if Dedrick Boyata hadn't been thrown in at centre back v Arsenal, & sent off before he even had a kick,, so that his arse went completely & another of our best prospects wasn't nervous as fuck for years after ? Now his name is shit on here. He was a TOP prospect. & may still get it together with the right psychology etc.

If Rekik goes to a Prem club & struggles, none of the big mouths on here will be associated with him afterwards. They'll drop him like a fucking stone & move onto the next one.

Seen it all before.

We have a duty to these kids, to give them the best chance,
 
<a class="postlink" href="https://twitter.com/City_Watch/status/478281083834740736" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;">https://twitter.com/City_Watch/status/4 ... 3834740736</a>

"VI: Karim Rekik has been told by City to report to training in July, loan not currently being considered. Could be in City's 1st team squad."
 
Marseille v Lille looks like it could potentially be on all of our calenders next season.

Marcos vs Karim.

City Watch @City_Watch · 3h

Voetbal Int'l: Marcelo Bielsa's Marseille are rivaling PSV to take Karim Rekik (19) next season if City decide to loan him out again.
 
Another loan would be the right decision imo.
He has momentum presently,so to bring him back here,and have him playing reserve football,would be detrimental to his progress,and cause him unrest......given the development and first team game time he could be gaining elsewhere.

Just a case of selecting the best option from those available.
 
Nasri said:
Bordeaux and Saint etienne keep an eye on Thierry Ambrose.

I will be surprised to see us loan him out so young, he has only really just broke through to the EDS this season but if City think he is ready then let's go for it.

I think it's great to see a few of our academy players being loaned and linked to top teams in the top European Leagues, it makes you think we are doing something right and that we have some talented youngsters in our ranks.

We could potentially see Lopes, Rekik and Ambrose in top 6 French teams next season, Huws could be in the Premier League whilst our new acquisition, Zuculini, could be playing in La Liga.

Very exciting future ahead hopefully.
 
FantasyIreland said:
Another loan would be the right decision imo.
He has momentum presently,so to bring him back here,and have him playing reserve football,would be detrimental to his progress,and cause him unrest......given the development and first team game time he could be gaining elsewhere.

Just a case of selecting the best option from those available.

I definitely concur that another loan is the right option. Although there is the rare exception, I think it takes quite a few years before a central defender really learns the game. There is no need to rush Rekik. Let him develop his skills in different leagues and then bring him back. I would much rather see a fully rounded player come back, rather than have a young gun sitting on the bench.

Rekik got it right himself when he said he needed to play week in and week out at his age. It looks like Txiki is supporting our young players getting experience in places other than the lower leagues in England. The loans of Lopes and Plummer are two recent examples.

Speaking of which I think loans to clubs in Europe are definitely a much better idea than playing in a lower league in England. If we want our young players to develop then playing with a league one club in England is not the answer.
 
jollylescott said:
FantasyIreland said:
Another loan would be the right decision imo.
He has momentum presently,so to bring him back here,and have him playing reserve football,would be detrimental to his progress,and cause him unrest......given the development and first team game time he could be gaining elsewhere.

Just a case of selecting the best option from those available.

I definitely concur that another loan is the right option. Although there is the rare exception, I think it takes quite a few years before a central defender really learns the game. There is no need to rush Rekik. Let him develop his skills in different leagues and then bring him back. I would much rather see a fully rounded player come back, rather than have a young gun sitting on the bench.

Rekik got it right himself when he said he needed to play week in and week out at his age. It looks like Txiki is supporting our young players getting experience in places other than the lower leagues in England. The loans of Lopes and Plummer are two recent examples.

Speaking of which I think loans to clubs in Europe are definitely a much better idea than playing in a lower league in England. If we want our young players to develop then playing with a league one club in England is not the answer.
I doubt there is anyone truely believing Plummer will make it here tho, i just think we are shipping him out to the scottish league for his own good. Just like Ryan Mcgivern was.
 
After impressing in Eindhoven last year, Karim Rekik was rumoured to be offered a return to the Philips Stadion ahead of the new Eredivisie campaign. However, in an interview with CityTV today, the defender stated he is out to earn a place in Manuel Pellegrini’s starting line-up at Manchester City.



The big 6ft 1inch central defender had an outstanding year last season under Philip Cocu playing 30 times in all competitions for PSV. He impressed Oranje coach Louis van Gaal too, who named him in his pre-World Cup 30-man provisional squad.

PSV technical director has discussed with the press the possibility of the young defender returning for another stint on loan but in Rekik’s latest interview, the youngster has stated he wants to “fight for a place” at City.

Rekik returned to Manchester this summer and is now currently with the first team in Scotland as part of City’s pre-season program. The 19-year-old is hoping that regular football last year in the Eredivisie has prepared him for his City future.

Rekik told City TV: “I just played every game which I think is important for a young player and it was a great experience for me. I have to spoke to him [Pellegrini] and he said that I had a good year last year and that I need to work now and fight for my place.”

“I will see if I’m ready [City’s first team] and that’s the choice of the manager,” he continued
 
Loan him out again now to a stronger league team. At least EL team to have extra games. Keeping him as 5th CB wont do him much good.
 
Neville Kneville said:
Hope him & Denayer get plenty of game time pre season so we can get at least some idea where they are up to.
Agree, very impressed with Denayer, he did step up his game, but he did run around like a goose without head once in a while :p
 
Neville Kneville said:
Hihosilva said:
Impressive last night. It's time he was given his chance in the squad this season.

Not on the basis of that game it isn't. He was all over the shop. Let's see how he does in the others.

I can't believe there is a City fan hoping a young player fails so he can be proved right.

Well your going to be proved wrong and Rekik is going to succeed.

He has grown substantially and you can see his ability on the ball.

In case you weren't aware friendlies are there to get players up to match fitness and gett he team to gel before the big kick off.

They are not serious games!
 
mad zab said:
Neville Kneville said:
Hihosilva said:
Impressive last night. It's time he was given his chance in the squad this season.

Not on the basis of that game it isn't. He was all over the shop. Let's see how he does in the others.

I can't believe there is a City fan hoping a young player fails so he can be proved right.

Well your going to be proved wrong and Rekik is going to succeed.

He has grown substantially and you can see his ability on the ball.

In case you weren't aware friendlies are there to get players up to match fitness and gett he team to gel before the big kick off.

They are not serious games!

Excuse me? If you disagree with me then fine, give me some examples of things he did DEFENSIVELY that make you think he should be included in the first team setup, which is what I was referring to.

Otherwise, if you can't discuss football without accusing a lifelong City fan who has been watching kids football since the 60s of WANTING a player to fail, just fuck off & ignore my posts, you utter wanker.

I would LOVE Rekik to make it. But that doesn't mean I'm going to watch him do stuff I fucking KNOW is wrong & sit there like a fucking dummy just because cunts like you want to censor it. Up yours.
 

Don't have an account? Register now and see fewer ads!

SIGN UP
Back
Top