Do you think he and the leadership are Islamaphobic?
He certainly is allowing himself to be perceived as such. For a man who is usually very good on hugging the middle I don’t know how Starmer went so far off…
Do you think he and the leadership are Islamaphobic?
Honestly, after never seeing you call out the absolute shambles of the party you support after month after month of one Tory or another embarrassing the country it doesn’t surprise me at all that you would take this stance.I think it’s more subtle than that and it feels like one of those damned if you do, damned if you don’t situations for him so I have a bit of sympathy here.
He’s going to be terrified of anti-semitism accusations resurfacing against the Labour Party. If he says anything remotely hostile towards Israeli actions the Tory press is going to round on Labour and him, pushing that door more and more. Maybe it will stick, maybe it won’t.
It’s hard to see how any other response would have ended any better for him, and party HQ would have war gamed different responses - deciding it’s better to piss off parts of the Labour Party (who they can say are legacy anti-Semitics if needs must) rather than the Tory press. I’m sure they’ve also “war gamed” voters won’t be swayed if Labour and Tories are following the same path.
Now if I was war gaming this in Tory HQ I’d be telling my side to double down on our support for Israel and look to goad labour in to breaking cover….and it’s working at a very low level based on some councillors resigning.
Politics is a dirty business.
He certainly is allowing himself to be perceived as such. For a man who is usually very good on hugging the middle I don’t know how Starmer went so far off…
What has he said that is Islamaphobic?
His comments made about Israel’s right to defend themselves has been perceived to include the green light to kill civilians in Gaza.
His comments made about Israel’s right to defend themselves has been perceived to include the green light to kill civilians in Gaza.
To paraphrase he was asked several times were Israel right in depriving Palenstinians of water food fuel etc..
Eventually he said yes they were. He mustn't have understood the question everytime it was asked or very likely he was thinking how do I not cock up my poll lead.
Other than someone with an agenda, I have literally zero idea how anyone could reach that conclusion.
I suspect given it's a 14 minute interview, half of which was devoted to Israel/Palestine, cut into a 5 second clip, it's not a surprise the subtlety is lost. Even that sentence is cut in half, as he qualifies it immediately by saying it should be done within International law, and he continually talks about Hamas rather than Palestine.I didn't like the original answer. I guess he was reflecting one "just war" view that belligerents are not obliged to feed or supply an enemy (so could cut off access to a well, but couldn't poison the well) but any subtlety was lost and instead it sounded like endorsing a siege.
I'm not sure what he thought was going to happen.
Honestly, after never seeing you call out the absolute shambles of the party you support after month after month of one Tory or another embarrassing the country it doesn’t surprise me at all that you would take this stance.
I don't think it was the right thing to say, but he was asked once, not several times, and his answer was a sentence which specifically said that Israel shouldn't break international law.To paraphrase he was asked several times were Israel right in depriving Palenstinians of water food fuel etc..
Eventually he said yes they were. He mustn't have understood the question everytime it was asked or very likely he was thinking how do I not cock up my poll lead.