I knew these countries would come up and as to why I tempered my point with the phrase "effective". These countries are not strictly communist in anything I've read, but have ideologies leaning more towards that than capitalism.
well depends if you actually have read any marx and engels stuff on capitalism, markets and free trade, communism allows for such as free trade, international trade and it recognises that capitalism is the dominant economic force and that it needs eventually to be replaced by a more equal model that benefits all rather than a few private owners who put profit possesion and property over people.
so yes Vietnam and china in paticular who trade extensively in the markets and internationally can be called communist even though the idea of communiam fed to us is one of repressive societies, gulags, and isolationlism, that is Juchism or starlinism, communism in Soviet nations dissapeared in 1924 and China is maoist more than anything, a mix of marxism and confucianism
Cuba is purposely not allowed to grow economically by america and Laos was treated like shite during and after the vietnam war and punished heavily by being on the Vietmanise side leaving it isolated.
some on here have no idea of the plethora of different offshoots of ideas like marxism, liberalism, conservatism and like to throw people under the simple blanket of one of the three, when it is alot more complex than that.
From what I read here there it is no marxist or traditional liberals(whiggism), there are socialists, some neo-liberals, maybe anarcho-communist/syndalists, a few conservatives and unionists, and a rare far right crank.