Keir Starmer

That’s quite an extreme statement. There are plenty of Labour party MPs from working class backgrounds with politics that are closer to your views.

Even someone to the left of your politics like Nadia Whittome donates half her parliamentary salary to charity and worked in social care during the pandemic (and donated her wages from that as well).

Im talking about the split in the Labour support. We see it on here every day. I don’t see it ever being fixed either because socially, what we think is so different.

Im economically to the left but socially conservative with a small C and always voted Labour until recently. The disagreements and fights are with those economically to the left but even further left socially.
 
Who's being foolish? He's spot on, as proven by the last GE and these local election results. Labour is becoming a centrist liberal talking shop rather than a labour movement and has lost touch with the majority of the voting population.

Have some trouble following that logic, it has become a centrist talking shop as proven by results under Jeremy Corbyn?

Can you explain that?
 
That’s quite an extreme statement. There are plenty of Labour party MPs from working class backgrounds with politics that are closer to your views.

Even someone to the left of your politics like Nadia Whittome donates half her parliamentary salary to charity and worked in social care during the pandemic (and donated her wages from that as well).

Is there that much of a correlation between their backgrounds and their politics anyway? I think the PLP has always had quite a lot of middle class and upwards MPs because that's the nature of politics in this country, Yes people from ordinary backgrounds, like Keir Hardie or Ramsey Macdonald have led the party but I imagine it's probably had more upper/middle class leaders in its history. The likes of Attlee were hardly from the 'hood. Some of the more recent radical senior labour politicians have been prep school boys that probably had upbringings completely different from mine but somewhere along the line our values converge.
 
Is there that much of a correlation between their backgrounds and their politics anyway? I think the PLP has always had quite a lot of middle class and upwards MPs because that's the nature of politics in this country, Yes people from ordinary backgrounds, like Keir Hardie or Ramsey Macdonald have led the party but I imagine it's probably had more upper/middle class leaders in its history. The likes of Attlee were hardly from the 'hood. Some of the more recent radical senior labour politicians have been prep school boys that probably had upbringings completely different from mine but somewhere along the line our values converge.
In spite of being a "sir", Starmer came from a fairly traditional working class background with his father being a toolmaker and his mother a nurse. Certainly not what some would term metropolitan elites.
 
Who would you vote for then?

It’s seems that if we get close to the general election and it looks like the Tories will win again the opposition parties need to man up and do something about it. They only need to work together for one general election and put to one side their differences. Campaign on what they agree on. Get in change the voting system and then go there own way.

Wouldn’t affect local elections anyhow.

depends what the policies were. I’m mainly voting based on that. I voted the Lib Dems yesterday as I like the councillor and the policies have been good for where I live.

your second point about them getting in and changing the voting system isn’t going to happen. Why would labour do that? It would negatively effect them

your other point about teaming up is not going to be a vote winner. Two separate parties. Surely Labour should be winning anyway - are they really in that poor of a situation they can’t win on their own?
 
depends what the policies were. I’m mainly voting based on that. I voted the Lib Dems yesterday as I like the councillor and the policies have been good for where I live.

your second point about them getting in and changing the voting system isn’t going to happen. Why would labour do that? It would negatively effect them

your other point about teaming up is not going to be a vote winner. Two separate parties. Surely Labour should be winning anyway - are they really in that poor of a situation they can’t win on their own?
Is that as true in May 2022 as it was in May 2011? I’m not so sure. It is not impossible for Labour to win outright without a rump of Scottish MPs, but from where they are now it might be impossible to win the kind of majority they enjoyed in 1997 if they are reliant solely on English and Welsh votes.
 
Have some trouble following that logic, it has become a centrist talking shop as proven by results under Jeremy Corbyn?

Can you explain that?
The talking shop eroded Corbyn from within. Now patting themselves on the backs for a job well done it's becoming apparent they have nothing to offer apart from not being Boris. With the state of the current govt you'd have thought this would be enough, but looking at the local election results it appears not.
 
In spite of being a "sir", Starmer came from a fairly traditional working class background with his father being a toolmaker and his mother a nurse. Certainly not what some would term metropolitan elites.

He does keep brining up the fact his dad was a tool maker - you can bet Fail and Express juorno's have already checked in the hopes it was a euphemism for dildo maker lol
 

Don't have an account? Register now and see fewer ads!

SIGN UP
Back
Top
  AdBlock Detected
Bluemoon relies on advertising to pay our hosting fees. Please support the site by disabling your ad blocking software to help keep the forum sustainable. Thanks.