Keir Starmer

I was possibly a bit over the top with "the worst in living memory" - although debatably that may be true.

But I agree with your post. What surprises me a lot about him is just how utterly rubbish he is at this politics lark. Time and time again he fails to read the room. And as his popularity plummets, he seems completely oblivious.
Please @Chippy_boy , will you stop talking common sense? some folk round here cannot (or don't want to) comprehend what it is you're saying.
 
PMQ’s have never really been ‘questions’. It’s always been a pissing content and the ‘questions’ are always just the opposition’s debating points.

I agree it needs reform - as does much of the way our parliament operates - but this isn’t a Starmer problem.

It’s a lot less of a shitstorm than it was under Johnson for example, when he turned up half cut and clueless most of the time.
Sadly the folk who perform in this comedy show are going home to there nice cushy lives while we have to cope with the chaos ............ ...and sadly for me i dont trust any of the them the left the right or the middle they on the whole are in it for there own benefits and us the poor sods are a remote second
 
Can you read? You’re imagining I’ve said something I haven’t.
Obviously not.... I don't agree that for the most part the public are ignorant thick morons, even still they do have a vote and for the most part they won't be voting Labour (just a feeling I have).
 
Sadly the folk who perform in this comedy show are going home to there nice cushy lives while we have to cope with the chaos ............ ...and sadly for me i dont trust any of the them the left the right or the middle they on the whole are in it for there own benefits and us the poor sods are a remote second
100% this.
 
He’s a very serious lawyer. It’s exactly this kind of emotionless and forensic approach to governing that is why we’ve not been sucked into the yank’s idiotic war in Iran.

He’s shit at comms but when it comes to big decisions like this, you want someone who’s going to examine the details like this.

He’s done more good than bad and he’s better than any of the alternatives.

I’ll give you a different take on that assessment in that he lacks the courage of his convictions. That manifests itself in him failing to take responsibility, hesitation, excuses for inaction, and weak leadership.
 
He’s a very serious lawyer. It’s exactly this kind of emotionless and forensic approach to governing that is why we’ve not been sucked into the yank’s idiotic war in Iran.

He’s shit at comms but when it comes to big decisions like this, you want someone who’s going to examine the details like this.

He’s done more good than bad and he’s better than any of the alternatives.
Did he seek all the details and facts before he sacked Olly Robbins?
 

Don't have an account? Register now and see fewer ads!

SIGN UP
Back
Top