I’m with you, I just don’t get it.
Maybe I’m not close enough to it but I’m struggling to find anything he’s said that’s in any way controversial.
In the interview he bungles his answer and then qualifies it with “obviously, everything should be done within international law”. That’s a pretty fucking important part of his statement. Yet all the clips I’ve seen online, including ones shared on this thread, seem to strategically cut out this very important piece of information. And now people seem to be just pretending he never said it.
So where is the part where he’s tacitly advocating war crimes, collective punishment and genocide? At worst I can say his delivery of his position was muddled and poor but let’s be straight… saying “Israel has a right to defend itself within the confines of international law” is a world away from advocating the deaths of children. The former is exactly the same position as basically every world leader.
Like I said I just don’t get it. Maybe somebody can point out the error of my ways.