117 M34 said:Dirty Harry said:117 M34 said:He was an embarrassment today.
Ok he got some shit off a few at the front but having a go back isn't acceptable for a professional footballer earning a few million quid a year which ultimately comes from the fans.
What was even worse though was his behaviour in the lap of honour, trying to stare fans out and gesturing to having a fight outside.
Shit player and his most memorable moment at city is being able to stand still and fold his arms for a couple of minutes.
How much would he need to be on for it to be OK for him to have a go back then mate ?
Same old shit from some fans, don't give it out if you can't take it back, Kolarov's clearly someone who's prepared to look after himself, I'm more surprised people are surprised he had a go back, fair play to him.
If he was on a tenner a week and had a go at the people who ultimately pay that then it wouldn't be acceptable.
He isn't the first player to get a bit of stick off his own fans, most others don't try to have a go back
Dirty Harry said:117 M34 said:Dirty Harry said:How much would he need to be on for it to be OK for him to have a go back then mate ?
Same old shit from some fans, don't give it out if you can't take it back, Kolarov's clearly someone who's prepared to look after himself, I'm more surprised people are surprised he had a go back, fair play to him.
If he was on a tenner a week and had a go at the people who ultimately pay that then it wouldn't be acceptable.
He isn't the first player to get a bit of stick off his own fans, most others don't try to have a go back
So what was the point of adding the 'earning a few million quid a year' then, plus, I'm not sure the total amount the fans pay actually contributes so much to his wages anyway ?
In any case I stand by my comment, as far as I'm concerned, if you abuse a footballer regardless, then they have every right to respond in kind, just like any other person, the fact he is wearing our shirt is good enough that he shouldn't be abused, it helps nobody.
Ha! Seriously? You're wanting to defend Lescott's awful game with the most convenient scapegoat in e squad? Get rid of both.Tbilisi said:mancityscot said:one of the worst left backs i've seen at city. awful excuse for a footballer
Poor Lescott,he didnt know whether to have a shit or a shave playing with that absolute waster.
taconinja said:Ha! Seriously? You're wanting to defend Lescott's awful game with the most convenient scapegoat in e squad? Get rid of both.Tbilisi said:mancityscot said:one of the worst left backs i've seen at city. awful excuse for a footballer
Poor Lescott,he didnt know whether to have a shit or a shave playing with that absolute waster.
117 M34 said:Dirty Harry said:117 M34 said:If he was on a tenner a week and had a go at the people who ultimately pay that then it wouldn't be acceptable.
He isn't the first player to get a bit of stick off his own fans, most others don't try to have a go back
So what was the point of adding the 'earning a few million quid a year' then, plus, I'm not sure the total amount the fans pay actually contributes so much to his wages anyway ?
In any case I stand by my comment, as far as I'm concerned, if you abuse a footballer regardless, then they have every right to respond in kind, just like any other person, the fact he is wearing our shirt is good enough that he shouldn't be abused, it helps nobody.
If there were no city fans, he wouldn't be paid a penny by city as he wouldn't be here.
If for example someone had a go at a nurse, dentist, politician, etc because they deemed they made a mistake and they replied with 'fuck off' or similar, do you think that would be ok?
Millwallawayveteran1988 said:taconinja said:Ha! Seriously? You're wanting to defend Lescott's awful game with the most convenient scapegoat in e squad? Get rid of both.Tbilisi said:Poor Lescott,he didnt know whether to have a shit or a shave playing with that absolute waster.
Might as well add Richards to the pot based on that shambolic effort from him today